期刊文献+

试论蜑名变迁与蜑民族属 被引量:16

On the Evolution of the Different Names of Dan in Chinese and the Ethnicities of the Different Dan Groups
原文传递
导出
摘要 "蜑"是中国古代汉族对南方少数民族的称谓,它最初称"诞",不同历史时期,有"蜒"、"蛋"、"疍"等同音同义异体字。历史上名为"蜑"的族群有两支——长江流域蜑民和南方沿海地区蜑民,前者是今天土家、瑶、苗等族先民,后者则是古越族后裔,两者没有血缘关系。"蜑"除专指上述两个区域的族群外,还用来泛指其他非汉人族群,与"蛮"的泛称同义。"蛮蜑"称呼甚为复杂,须依据他们所处区域及其族群特征,并通过语境来判断其所指代的族属。 In ancient China the word 'Dan' was used to denote the ethnic minorities living in South China by the Hans. There were several substitutional Chinese characters of 'Dan' with the same sound in different periods. Historically, there were two large ethnic groups of Dan in ancient China. One lived in the Yangtze River valley, which was the ancestors of some modern ethnic minorities including Tujia, Yao, and Miao. The other lived in the southern coastal areas of China, which derived from the ancient Yue. There was no blood relation between the two ethnic groups above-mentioned. The related ethnic groups living in the coastal areas began to be called 'the Dans' in the Song Dynasty, and this phenomenon reflected the tendency of the Hans' going down south. While the name of 'the Dans' was applied to the ethnic groups living in the two above areas, it was also used to denote the non-Hans, in other words, 'the Barbarians'. The applications of the name of 'the Dans' and ' the Barbarians' were quite complex. Therefore, in order to judge correctly the ethnicities of different Dan groups, one need to pay much attention to the areas where they lived, the specific ethnic features which they had, and the contexts in which they were referred to.
作者 詹坚固
出处 《民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期81-91,110,共11页 Ethno-National Studies
关键词 蜑民 长江流域 南方沿海地区 族属 Dan Yangtze River valley southern coastal areas of China general term ethnicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张宗祥.《说郛》卷19,《笔记小说大观》二十五编,第354页下.
  • 2(宋)周必大.《庐陵周益国文忠公集》卷91,四川大学古籍所编.《宋集珍本丛刊》(第52册),线装书局2004年版,第7页.
  • 3黄新美.珠江口水上居民(疍家)种族现状的研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),1990,30(2):99-105. 被引量:4
  • 4《广州发现一处秦汉造船工场遗址》[J].新华月报,1977,.
  • 5汪冰冰,鹏宇.说“蛋”[J].现代语文(下旬.语言研究),2008(10):148-149. 被引量:5
  • 6吴永章.古代鄂川湘黔边区蜒人与岭南蜒人之比较研究[J].广西民族研究,1987(2):81-85. 被引量:7
  • 7傅贵九.《明清蛋民考略》.《清王朝的建立、阶层及其他》,天津人民出版社.1994年版第179页.
  • 8蒙默.说蜒-兼论廪君的族属[J].中华文化论坛,1994(2):31-35. 被引量:5
  • 9刘美崧.《建平鬻、天门蛮、临江蛮兴衰述略》,《魏晋南北朝史论文集》,齐鲁书社1991年版,第236-239页.
  • 10(清)丁廉.《三洲游记》(节录),艾周昌编注.《中非关系史文选(1500--1918)》,华东师范大学出版社1989年版,第64页.

二级参考文献4

共引文献15

同被引文献228

引证文献16

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部