1Barbosa PV, Makhlouf AA, Thorner D. Shock wave lithotripsy associated with greater prevalence of hypertension. Urology, 2011,78: 22-25.
2Krambeck AE, Rule AD, Li X, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup. J Urol, 2011, 185 : 164-169.
3Clark DL, Connors BA, Evan AP, et al. Localization of renal oxidative stress and inflammatory response after lithotripsy. BJU Int, 2009, 103: 1562-1568.
4Clark DL, Connors BA, Evan AP, et al. Effect of shock wave number on renal oxidative stress and inflammation. BJU Int, 2011, 107 : 318-322.
5Li X, Xue Y, He D, et al. Shock wave induces chronic renal lesion through activation of the nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway. World J Urol, 2010, 28: 657-662.
7Clark DL, Connors BA, Handa RK, et al. Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves reduces the renal oxidative stress and inflammation caused by high-energy shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2011, 39: 437-442.
8Lambert EH, Walsh R, Moreno MW, et al. Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock randomized trial. J Urol, 2010, wave lithotripsy: a prospective 183 : 580-584.
9Ben Saddik MA, A1-Qahtani Sejiny S, Ndoye M, et al. Flexible ureteroseopy in the treatment of kidney stone between 2 and 3 era. Prog Urol, 2011, 21 : 327-332.
10Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol, 2009, 23: 1395-1398.
