期刊文献+

单纯^125I放射性粒子植入治疗早期前列腺癌的临床分析 被引量:8

Clinical analysis of permanent ^125I prostate brachytherapy monotherapy for early prostate cancer ( report of 18 cases)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨单纯^125I放射性粒子植入治疗早期前列腺癌的临床疗效。方法2007年1月至2011年7月前列腺癌患者18例,年龄60~81岁,平均74岁。术前PSA0.38—8.73μg/L,平均5.09μg/L。均经前列腺穿刺病理诊断为前列腺癌,Gleason评分5—6分,临床分期T1c-T24。采用直肠B超引导下经会阴植入^125I粒子治疗。结果本组手术顺利,手术时间37~52min,平均植入粒子54粒,术后住院时间3—4d。随访时间3~57个月,平均15个月,1例失访。随访17例血PSA无进展生存率为100%(17/17),7例随访超过18个月,血PSA水平长期低于0.20仙g/L,其中3例波动于0—0.08μg/L,3例波动于0.02—0.12μg/L,1例波动于0.12~0.20μg/L。17例均未出现严重并发症。结论单纯^125I放射性粒子植入治疗早期前列腺癌安全、有效。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of permanent ^125I prostate brachytherapy monotherapy in patients with early prostate cancer. Methods A total of 18 patients with prostate cancer was diagnosed by prostate biopsy, with Gleason score 5 - 6, average PSA 5.09 ng/ml (range, 0.38 - 8.73) , and clinical stage Tlo - T2. All patients underwent 3-dimensional conformal brachytherapy with transperineal ultrasound-guide ^125I seeds prostate implantation. Results None of the patients had any ad- verse events during the operation processes. The operation time was from 37 to 52 minutes and postoperative hospitalization time was from 3 to 4 days. The mean number of implanted 125I seeds was 54. All patients were followed up for 3 to 57 months with a mean of 15 months, while one patient was lost during followingup. The survival rate of PSA progression free was 100% (17/17). The PSA was under 0.2 ng/ml for a long time in the 7 cases who had been followed-up for more than 18 months. The PSA did not show any rising trend in all 17 cases. No severe complications occurred in all cases. Conclusions Brachytherapy monotherapy with ^125I seeds implantation is safe and effective for patients with early prostate cancer.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期55-57,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 ^125I近距离放射疗法 Prostatic neoplasms Carcinoma ^125I brachytherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010, 60: 277-300.
  • 2Heidenreich A, Aus G, BoUa M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 2008, 53: 68-80.
  • 3Kuban DA, Levy LB, Potters L, et al. Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 65: 1487-1493.
  • 4Whitmore WF Jr, Hilaris B, Grabstald H. Retropubic implantation of iodine 125 in the treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol, 1972, 108 : 918-920.
  • 5Potters L, Klein EA, Kattan MW, et al. Monotherapy for stage Tl -T2 prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or permanent seed implantation. Radiother Oncol, 2004, 71 : 29-33.
  • 6Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J, et al. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of Prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 44: 789-799.
  • 7Zelefsky M J, Wallner KE, Ling CC, et al. Comparison of the 5year outcome and morbidity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transperineal permanent iodine-125 implantation for early-stage prostatic cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17: 517-522.
  • 8Block T, Czempiel H, Zimmermann F. Transperineal permanent seed implantation of "low-risk" prostate cancer: 5-year experiences in 118 patients. Strahlenther Onkol, 2006, 182: 666-671.
  • 9Zelefsky M J, Yamada Y. Five-year outcome of intraperative conformal permanent 1-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 67 : 65-70.
  • 10DeWitt KD, Sandier HM, Weinberg V, et al. What does postradiotherapy PSA nadir tell us about freedom from PSA failure and progression-free survival in patients with low and intermediaterisk localized prostate cancer? Urology, 2003, 62: 492-496.

二级参考文献11

  • 1李汉忠,严维刚.前列腺癌近距离治疗的研究进展[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(2):129-131. 被引量:11
  • 2Gelblum DY, Potters L, Ashley R, et al. Urinary morbidity following ultrasound guided transperineal prostate seed im plantation. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys, 1999,45:59-67.
  • 3Norderhaug I, Dahl O, Heikkila R, et al. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review of clinical and cost effectiveness. Eur Urol,2003,44:40-46.
  • 4Merrick GS, Wallner KE, Butler WM. Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for the management of carcinoma of the prostate gland. J Urol, 2003,169:1643-1652.
  • 5Hall JD, Boyd JC, Lippert MC, et al. Why patients choose prostatectomy or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of a descriptive survey. Urology,2003,61:402- 407.
  • 6Hsu IC, Pickett B, Shinohara K, et al. Normal tissue dosimetric comparison between HDR prostate implant boost and conformal external beam radiotherapy boost: potential for dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000,46:851- 858.
  • 7Kleinberg L, Wallner K, Roy J, et al. Treatment-related symptoms during the first year following transperineal 125-I prostate implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1994, 28:985-990.
  • 8Merrick GS, Bulter WM, Lief JH, et al. Temporal resolution of urinary morbidity following prostate brachytberapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47:121-128.
  • 9Stone NN, Stock RG. Complications following permanent prostate brachytherapy. Eur Urol, 2002,41 : 427-433.
  • 10Elshaikh MA, Angermeier K, Ulchaker JC, et al. Effect of anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric variables on urinary retention after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Urology,2003,61 : 152-155.

共引文献2

同被引文献96

引证文献8

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部