摘要
司法能动是法院在案件审理中,不因循先例和遵从成文法的字面含义进行司法解释的一种司法理念以及基于此理念的行动。我国法院在发挥司法能动性,处理环境纠纷案件方面作出了大量努力,为经济社会发展提供了司法保障。但法院在发挥司法能动性处理环境纠纷案件中仍然存在较大的问题。解决这些问题,必须把握法院在环境纠纷案件处理中司法能动的向度,落实司法独立,引导法官正确行使自由裁量权,努力培养环境司法专业人才,发挥法官适用法律的能动性。
Judicial activism is a piece of judicial philosophy and judicial actions based on this idea that the courts don't follow precedent and comply with the literal meaning of the statute in the case hearing. Our courts have made considerable efforts in the handling of environmental disputes and played an active judicial activism, in order to provide judicial protection for economic and social development. However, in dealing with environmental disputes the courts have still existed many problems in the process of playing judicial activism. To solve these problems, we must take the court judicial activism dimension in dealing with the environmental disputes, implement the independence of the judiciary, guide the judges properly exercise discretion, foster environmental justice professionals, and play a dynamic role in applying the law.
出处
《时代法学》
2012年第1期64-68,共5页
Presentday Law Science
基金
江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地江西理工大学环境资源法研究中心的资助
关键词
法院
环境纠纷案件
司法能动
court
environmental disputes
judicial activism