3Papadopoulos M,Jannowitz C,Boettcher P,et al.Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry:an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2005,33(4):229.
5Grauer D,Cevidanes L S H,Styner M A,et al.Accuracy and Landmark Error Calculation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Generated Cephalograms.Angle Orthod,2010,80(2):286-294.
6Yitschaky O,Redlich M,Abed Y,et al.Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images.Angle Orthod,2011,81(1):11-16.
7Van Vlijmen OJC,Bergé SJ,Swennen GR,et al.Comparison of Cephalometric Radiographs Obtained From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans and Conventional Radiographs.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2009,67(1):92-97.
8Ludlow JB,Ivanovic M.Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2008,106(1):106-14.
9Malkoc S,Sari Z,Usumez S,et al.The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs.Eur J Orthod,2005,27(3):315-21.
9Ludlow JB,Gubler M,Cevidanes L,et al.Precision of cephalometric landmark identification:cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136:312.
10Chien PC,Parks ET,Eraso F,et al.Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2009,38:262-273.