摘要
新修订的《节约能源法》把节能作为基本国策,创新了节能自愿协议这一市场化节能机制。作为特殊行政合同的节能自愿协议有公共利益性、自愿性特点。从对北京、山东、浙江、上海等省市实际调研结果看,节能自愿协议实施中的成果和缺陷并存。缺陷表现在协议客体难以达成,主体权利义务边界不清晰,协议的义务本位性导致激励不相容,违约责任制度形同虚设,协议适用范围窄。如何应用市场化的节能机制实现"十二五"及将来国家节能减排目标仍然是亟待解决的现实课题。
Energy conservation has been China＇s national policy since birth of New China, which stipulated in Energy Conservation Law in 1997 for the first time. In modification of the Law, Voluntary Agreement of Energy Conservation is set up. During field research in Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang and Shandong Province, we find such mechanism may disappear in China in the future. From its pilot period to promotion, the Agreement carries such defects as difficult objects, unclear contractual rights and obligations, narrow scope of application, etc. Marketbased mechanisms for energy saving are still key topics in question in 12th five-year plan.
出处
《上海节能》
2012年第1期40-45,共6页
Shanghai Energy Saving
基金
国家自然科学基金(70941073)
浙江省教育厅科研项目(Y200908820)
浙江省高校人文社科"决策科学与创新管理"重点研究基地项目(RWSKZD01-201006)
关键词
节能自愿协议
《节约能源法》
命令-控制
义务本位
公众参与
Key words： Voluntary Agreement of Energy Conservation
Energy ConservationLaw
command-control
public participation
