期刊文献+

盐酸替罗非班在急性心肌梗死患者介入治疗中的应用 被引量:7

Application of tirofiban hydrochloride in patients with acute myocardial infarction by interventional therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨盐酸替罗非班在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗中的应用价值。方法 74例AMI患者分为观察组42例和对照组32例,对照组患者给予常规治疗,观察组在常规治疗的基础上给予盐酸替罗非班。观察2组患者出血事件、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积指数(LVEDVI)、左心室收缩末期容积指数(LVESVI)及主要心脏不良反应。结果 2组出血率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组血小板减少症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1个月观察组LVEF、LVEDVI及LVESVI较对照组明显改善(P<0.05);术后3个月2组患者LVEF、LVEDVI及LVESVI比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者主要心脏不良反应事件发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论盐酸替罗非班可有效改善行PCI治疗患者的心功能,抗血小板聚集,减少出血、血小板减少症及主要心脏不良反应事件的发生。 Objective To explore the value of tirofiban hydrochloride in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) by percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods Seventy-four patients with AMI were divided into observation group(n=42) and control group(n=32),the patients in control group were treated with conventional therapy,based on this,the patients in observation group were treated with tirofiban hydrochloride.The bleeding events,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic volume index(LVEDVI),left ventricular end-systolic volume index(LVESVI) and main adverse effect of heart were observed in two groups.Results There was no statistical difference in the rate of bleeding between two groups(P0.05).The incidence rate of thrombocytopenia in observation group was lower than that in control group(P0.05).Compared with control group,LVEF,LVEDVI and LVESVI were improved obviously in observation group one month after operation(P0.05).Three months after operation,there was no statistical difference in LVEF,LVEDVI and LVESVI between two groups(P0.05).The incidence rate of main adverse effect of heart in observation group was lower than that in control group(P0.05).Conclusion Tirofiban hydrochloride can effectively improved the heart function,prevent platelet aggregation,decrease the incidence rates of bleeding,thrombocytopenia and main adverse effect of heart in patients underwent PCI.
出处 《新乡医学院学报》 CAS 2012年第2期129-130,133,共3页 Journal of Xinxiang Medical University
关键词 盐酸替罗非班 急性心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入 tirofiban hydrochloride acute myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Spoden G A, Mazurek S, Morandell D, et al. Isotype-specific inhibi- tors of the glycolytic key regulator pyruvate kinase subtype M2 moderately decelerate tumor cell proliferation [ J]. Int J Cancer, 2008,123(2) :312-321.
  • 2Softer D, Moussa I, Karatepe M, et al. Suboptimal inhibition of platelet aggregation following tirofiban bolus in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unstable angina pectoris [J]. Am J Cardiol,2003 ,91 (7) :872-875.
  • 3Razakjr O A,Tan H C ,Yip W L,et al. Predictors of bleeding com- plications and thrombocytopenia with the use of abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention [ J ]. J Interv Cardiol , 2005,18( 1 ) :33-37.
  • 4董西学,宁彬,刘伟,阳海红.国产药物支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合症的临床研究[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(12):1066-1067. 被引量:9
  • 5Tungsubutra W,Tresukosol D, Krittayaphong R, et al. Primary per- cutaneous transluminal coronary intervention compared with intra- venous thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation myocar- dial infarction[J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2007,90(4) :672-678.
  • 6周东晖,程守联,金元哲,王琦,柳兢,周霞,姚凤臣.盐酸替罗非班对急性冠脉综合征急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流灌注的影响[J].中国实用内科杂志,2008,28(12):1062-1063. 被引量:10
  • 7Elmouehi D A, Bates E R. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary gyndromes [ J ]. Minerva Cardioangiol,2003,51 ( 5 ):547-560.
  • 8马雪原.替罗非班治疗急性心肌梗死介入术后患者的疗效研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2011,19(7):1111-1112. 被引量:9

二级参考文献11

  • 1李芳,余素琴,王琳.替罗非班对急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床症状和心电图的影响[J].临床心血管病杂志,2004,20(8):466-467. 被引量:23
  • 2杨跃进,赵京林.急性心肌梗死再灌注治疗的现代观念[J].中国实用内科杂志,2006,26(8):1124-1128. 被引量:20
  • 3张奇,张瑞岩,张建盛,胡健,杨震坤,倪钧,张宪,沈卫峰.国产与进口西罗莫司药物洗脱支架治疗冠心病临床疗效对比[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2006,14(4):198-201. 被引量:6
  • 4Van't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle myocardial infarction study group [ J ]. Circulation, 1998,97:2302 -2306.
  • 5Feldman LJ, Coste P, Furber A, et al. Incomplete resolution of ST- segment elevation is a marker of transient microcirculatory dysfunction after stenting for acute myocardial infarction[ J]. Circulation ,2003,107:9684 - 2689.
  • 6Limbruno U, Micheli A, De Carlo M, et al. Mechanical prevention of distal embolization during primary angioplasty: safety, feasibility, and impact on myocardial reperfusion [ J ]. Circulation, 2003, 108,171 - 176.
  • 7Warnhohz A, Ostad MA, Heitzer T, et al. Effect of tirofiban on percutaneous coronary intervention-induced endothelial dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2005,95:20 - 23.
  • 8Lefkovittz,Plow EF,Topol EJ.Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists trial[J].Eur Heart J,1999,I(suppl E):1826.
  • 9Piana RN,Pail GY,Moscucci M,et al.Incidence and treatment of "no-reflow" after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Circulation,1994,89(6):2514-2518.
  • 10Karvouni E,Katrits DC,Ioannidis JP.Intravenous glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonsists reduce mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41(1):26-32.

共引文献25

同被引文献32

  • 1朱稚丹,陈冬青,罗燕华,吴佳明,蔡志雄.老年急性心肌梗死患者急诊介入术后早期程序康复与QTc离散度的影响[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,3(4):12-14. 被引量:2
  • 2尹作民,马海龙,刘为生,滕军.CTFC对STEMI急诊PCI术后心肌血流灌注的评价[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2005,20(4):283-285. 被引量:2
  • 3Ito H,Jomooka T,Sakai N,et al.Lack of myocardial immediatelyafter successfulthromlysis:a predictor of poor recovery of left ven-tricular function in anterior myocardial infarction[J].Circulation,1992,85(5):1699-1705.
  • 4Bekkers S C,Yazdani S K,Virmani R,et al.Microvascular obstruc-tion:underlying pathophysiology and clinical diagnosis[J].AmColl Cardiol,2010,55(16):1649-1660.
  • 5Becker DM,Segal J,Vaidya D,et al.Sex differences in platelet reactivi- ty and response to low-dose aspirin therapy[J].JAMA,2006,295(12):1420-1427.
  • 6Hochman JS,Buller CE,Sleeper LA,et al.Cardiogenic shock complica- ting acute myocardial infarction etiologies,management and outcome:A report from the SHOCK Trial Registry[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,36(3);1063-1070.
  • 7De Lemos JA,Braunwald E.ST segment resolution as a tool for assess- ing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,38(5):1283-1294.
  • 8Michelson AD,Barmard MR,Krueger LA.Evaluation of plateletfunction by flow,cytometry[J].Methods,2000,21(3);259-270.
  • 9Schwartzenberg S,Halkin A,Finkelstein A,et al.The no-re-flow phe- nomenon following percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Harefuah,2009,148(6):381-385.
  • 10Niccoli G,Burzotta F,Galiuto L,et al.Myocardial no-reflow in humans[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,54(4):281-292.

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部