期刊文献+

脑电双频指数指导下不同麻醉诱导方式对喉罩插入条件的影响 被引量:9

Effects of different induction methods on laryngeal mask airway inserting condition under the direction of bispectral index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察脑电双频指数(BIS)指导下不同麻醉诱导方式对喉罩插入条件的影响。方法 60例择期行宫腔镜手术患者,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,根据诱导方式的不同随机均分为三组:七氟醚复合丙泊酚组(SP组)、七氟醚组(S组)及丙泊酚组(P组)。SP组肺活量法吸入七氟醚,待患者意识消失后静脉注射丙泊酚;S组以肺活量法吸入七氟醚;P组静脉泵注丙泊酚。BIS值稳定于40~50超过20s后插入喉罩。记录诱导开始至成功插入喉罩的时间及成功率;评估下颌松弛度评分和喉罩插入后咳嗽及肢体运动评分。结果诱导至喉罩插入时间S组>SP组>P组(P<0.05)。呼吸暂停发生率P组(40%)明显高于SP和S组(均为0)(P<0.05)。不自主肢体运动发生率P组高于SP和S组(35%vs5%和10%,P<0.05)。结论 BIS指导下七氟醚复合丙泊酚诱导较丙泊酚或七氟醚诱导能提供更好的喉罩插入条件。 Objective To observe the effects of different induction methods on laryngeal mask airway (LMA) inserting condition under the direction of bispectral index (BIS). Methods Sixty patients scheduled for elective hysteroscopy surgery, ASA class I or Ⅱ, were randomized into three groups (n= 20) : group SP receiving sevoflurane and propofol induction, group S receiving sevoflurane induction, group P receiving propofol induction. Patients in groups SP and S received ,evoflurane using the vital capacity breath (VCB) technique. The LMA was inserted when BIS mainlined 40-50 over 20 s. The time from the induction to the LMA insertion and the achievement ratio were recorded. The score of jaw mobility, coughing and movement after LMA insertion were assessed and recorded. Results The time from the induction to the LMA insertion was group S〉group SP〉group P (P〈0. 05). The incidences of apnea and involuntary movement were higher in group P than in groups SP and S (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Under the direction of BIS, sevoflurane-propofol induction provides better condition for LMA insertion than sevoflurane and propofol.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期5-7,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 首都医学发展科研基金(2007-1037)
关键词 脑电双频指数 丙泊酚 七氟醚 喉罩 Bispectral index Propofol Sevoflurane Laryngeal mask airway
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Siddik-sayyid SM,Aouad MT,Taha SK,et al.A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.Anesth Analg,2005,100(4):1204-1209.
  • 2Kati I,Demirel CB,Huseyinoglu UA,et al.Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngealmask airway insertion.Tohuku J Exp Med,2003,200(3):111-118.
  • 3Molloy ME,Buqqy DJ,Scanlon P.Propofol or sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion.Can J Anesth,1999,46(4):322-326.
  • 4Ibrahim AE,Taraday JK,Kharasch ED.Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane,midazolam,and propofol.Anesthesiology,2001,95(5):1151-1159.
  • 5Myles PS,Leslie K,McNeil J,et al.Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anesthesia:the B-Aware randomindeed controlled trail.Lancet,2004,363(p423):1757-1763.
  • 6胡利国,方才,朱运莲.丙泊酚靶控输注全麻诱导时BIS值与机体应激反应的关系[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(7):560-562. 被引量:28

二级参考文献8

  • 1Servin FS.TCI compared with manually controlled infusion of propofol:a multicentre study.Anaesthesia,1998,53 (suppl 1):82-86.
  • 2Ibrahim AE,Taraday JK,Kharasch ED.Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane,midazolam and propfol.Anesthesiology,2001,95:1151-159.
  • 3Kreuer S,Bruhn J,Larsen R,et al.Comprasion of Alaris AEP index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth,2003,91:336-340.
  • 4Upton RN,Ludbrook GL,Crant C,et al.Cardiac output is a determinant of the initial concentrations of propofol after shortinfusion administration.Anesth Analg,1999,89:545-552.
  • 5Myles PS,Leslie K,McNeil J,et al.Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia:the B-Aware randomieed controlled trail.Lancet,2004,363:1757-1768.
  • 6Sebel PS,Lowdon JD.Propofol:a new intravenous anesthetic.Anesthesiology,1989,71:260-277.
  • 7于布为,彭章龙,赵永泉.高龄病人异丙酚分步TCI时效应室浓度及BIS的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2002,22(12):711-714. 被引量:44
  • 8韩新生,吕建瑞,薛荣亮,丁晓英,李有才,张延均.丙泊酚靶控输注全麻诱导时机体应激反应的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2003,19(6):343-345. 被引量:45

共引文献27

同被引文献68

  • 1左明章,李晓琳,王忠,杜翔华,于晖.脑电双频指数指导吸入异氟烷对腹部手术老年病人麻醉恢复的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(7):490-492. 被引量:11
  • 2蔡进,郭曲练,唐朝辉.脑电双频谱指数和听觉诱发电位指数监测老年人地氟醚麻醉深度的评价[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(12):891-894. 被引量:8
  • 3程平瑞,江伟航,董静毅,黄芳,黄雁,梁健华.纤维支气管镜清醒插管时不同剂量瑞芬太尼复合咪达唑仑的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(6):493-495. 被引量:23
  • 4庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1301.
  • 5吴云林,程时丹.早期胃癌内镜鉴别诊断手册[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2010:75-77.
  • 6Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, et al. A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for la- ryngeal mask airway insertion in adults [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2005,100(4) :1204-1209.
  • 7Rai MR, Parry TM, Dombrovskis A, et al. Remifentanil target- controlled infusion vs propofol target controlled infusion for consious seddation for awake fibreopic intubation: a double- blined randomized controlled trial[ J]. Br J Anaesth ,2008,100 (1) :125-130.
  • 8Chemik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer' s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam [ J ]. J Clin Psychopharma- co1,1990,10(4) :244-251.
  • 9Degoute CS, Rar MJ, Manchon M, et al. Remifentanil and con- trolled hypotension with hitroprusside or esmolol during tym- panoplasty [ J]. Can J Anaesth ,2001,48 (1) :20-27.
  • 10Raeder J. Opioid or propofol:what kind of drug for what kind of sedation? Manual dosing or target controlled infusion E J ]. Anesth Analg,2009,108 ( 3 ) :704-706.

引证文献9

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部