4AUDIT COMMISSION.CPA□The Harder Test: Scores andanalysis of performanceinsingletierandcountycouncils 2007[R]. Local government National Report, February 2008.
5RHYS ANDREWS GEORGE ABOYNE, External Constraints on Local Service Standards: The Case of Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English Local Government[J].Pubhc Administration Vol. 83, No. 3, 2005.
6AUDIT COMMISSION. Direction of travel assessments: Guide to CPA 2006 for single tier and county councils[R]. August 2006.
7AUDIT COMMISSION. CPA The Harder Test 2006 Guide to service assessments for single tier and county councils[R]. August 2006.
8AUDIT COMMISSION. The Impact of the Comprehensive PerformanceAssessment of Local Government 2002- 2008[R]. March 2009.
9United Kingdom Health Care Systems in Transition 1999, available on: http:// www. euro. who, int/doeument/e68283, pdf, accessed Jua. 2nd, 2007.
10Highlights on health in the United Kingdom 2004, available on: http:// www. euro. who. int/document/e88530, pdf, accessed Jua. 2nd, 2007.
5Alfred Tat-Kei Ho. Accounting for the Value of Performance Measurement from the Perspective of Midwestem Mayors [ J ]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2006,16, (2):217 -235.
6Carolyn J. Heinrich. Do Government Bureaucrats Make Effective Use of Performance Management Information? [ J ]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1999,9, ( 3 ) :363 - 394.
7David N. Ammons,William C. Rivenbark. Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benehmarking Project[ J ]. Public Administration Review,2008, (3) : 304 -318.
8Robert D. Behn. Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures [ J]. Public Administration Re- view,2003,63, (5) :579 - 586.
9Xiaohu Wang. Assessing Performance Measurement Impact : A Study of U. S. local Government [ J ]. Public Performance & Management Review,2002,26, ( 1 ) :26 -43.
