期刊文献+

员工建言行为的情绪机制:一个新的探索视角 被引量:40

The Emotion Mechanism of Employee Voice Behavior:A New Exploratory Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有研究考察了建言行为的诸多影响因素,然而探讨情绪影响建言的研究则是新崛起的一个方向。文章一方面从情绪影响认知信息加工最终影响建言决策的微观角度来分析情绪与建言的关系,另一方面从组织行为研究的宏观层面探讨情绪与建言关系,并以情绪事件理论、情绪循环理论和情绪反馈理论为基础,结合情绪研究的相关文献,对员工情绪产生的几大来源,员工情绪对建言决策的影响,建言者的情绪对被建言者(建言对象)的情绪影响,员工建言被采纳与否等几个涉及情绪的过程进行分析和阐述,并构造了建言行为情绪机制模型;系统地揭示了整个建言行为链上伴随的情绪机制,并对恐惧、希望、心理安全、后悔等情绪对建言的影响作了示例分析。文章最后进行了总结与展望。 Despite previous research have examined many factors that influence voice behavior,little is known about the role of emotions play in this process.This paper analyzes two aspects of the relationship between emotions and voice behavior,one is the micro level that emotions affect voice behavior through cognitive information-processing,another is the macro level that is in organizational context.Drawing on the idea of the affective events theory,the emotion cycles theory,emotion feedback theory and related research,this paper analyses and explains several process about emotion:sources of employee emotion,the impact of employee emotion on their voice behavior,the impact of employee emotion on voice objects emotion,employee's opinions have been adopted or not,and so on.Then we establish the emotion mechanism of employee voice behavior,systematically revealing the emotion mechanism on the whole voice behavior chain,and also give some examples how emotions such as fear,hope,psychological safety and regret affect employee voice behavior.Finally,we conclude by discussing limitations,future directions,and implications for research.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期274-282,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71073108,70902056) 教育部人文社科规划项目(09YJCZH087) 苏州大学“211工程”三期重点项目 苏州大学重大研究项目
关键词 建言行为 情绪 认知加工 情绪事件理论 情绪循环理论 情绪反馈理论 voice behavior emotions cognitive processing affective events theory emotion feedback theory emotion cycles theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1段锦云.中国背景下建言行为研究:结构、形成机制及影响[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):185-192. 被引量:73
  • 2段锦云,傅强,田晓明,孔瑜.情感事件理论的内容、应用及研究展望[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(4):599-607. 被引量:99
  • 3Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough:Climates for initiative and psychological safety, processinnovations, and firm performance. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 24, 45–68.
  • 4Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L.Q. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback,anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.
  • 5Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2008).Future-oriented emotions: Conceptualization and behavioraleffects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 685–696.
  • 6Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extendingthe group engagement model: Linkages between socialidentity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarolebehavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464.
  • 7Chiaburu, D. S., Marinova, S. V., & Van Dyne, L. (2008).Should I do it or not? An initial model of cognitiveprocesses predicting voice behaviors. In L. T. Kane & M.R. Poweller (Eds.), Citizenship in the 21st century (pp.127–153). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • 8Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect asinformation. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect andsocial cognition (pp.121–144). Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum.
  • 9Davis, E. L., Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., & Quas, J. A.(2010). Metacognitive emotion regulation: Children’sawareness that changing thoughts and goals can alleviatenegative emotions. Emotion, 10, 498–510.
  • 10Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behaviorand employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy ofManagement Journal, 50, 869–884.

二级参考文献76

  • 1段锦云,钟建安.组织中员工的角色外行为[J].人类工效学,2004,10(4):69-71. 被引量:20
  • 2段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量:99
  • 3刘惠琴,张德.团队层面的高校学科团队创新绩效模型研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(3):421-427. 被引量:20
  • 4段锦云,王重鸣,钟建安.大五和组织公平感对进谏行为的影响研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):19-22. 被引量:84
  • 5段锦云,陈红,孙维维,赵立.沉默:组织改变和发展的阻力[J].人类工效学,2007,13(2):69-71. 被引量:23
  • 6Van Dyne, L., & LePine extra-role behaviors J. A. (1998). Helping and voice Evidence and construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal 41(1), 108-119.
  • 7Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195-1207.
  • 8Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 125-139.
  • 9Wood, S. J., & Wall, T. D. (2007). Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management performance studies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(7), 1335-1372.
  • 10Van Dyne, L, Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.

共引文献169

同被引文献555

引证文献40

二级引证文献280

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部