期刊文献+

基于财富效用的产权拍卖定价的计算模拟 被引量:1

Computational simulation on auction pricing of property rights based on the wealth utility
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过构造财富效用函数建立了产权协商交易定价模型,导出产权交易定价的加权边际效用零和方程.根据不同竞买人的偏好差异和对产权的预期价值差异,运用出售方与不同竞买人的加权边际效用零和的定价方程求解出对应的协商交易均衡价格,并选择最大均衡价格作为产权拍卖中标的参考价格.计算了不同中标价格的出售方和中标人的财富效用值和福利水平值,比较发现只有以最大均衡价格中标产权拍卖的福利水平和市场效率最高;若中标价格大于产权的最大预期价值,拍卖交易的福利水平为负,并出现所谓的"赢者灾难".对竞买人用于竞标的财富实力对均衡价格的影响作了初步探讨,其研究结论符合常理. The bargaining pricing model is built by constructing the wealth utility function of property right price; the equation of weighted marginal utility zero-sum for solving the equilibrium price of property right is derived. In the light of differenc.es of preferences and expectation values to property right of buyers, the equilibrium prices of bargaining is solved by means of the different equations of weighted marginal utility zero-sum of seller and buyers with a numerical case, and the maximum equilibrium price is chosen as the winner reference price. The wealth utilities and welfare function level of the seller and the winners at different winner prices are computed, by the comparison of the computed results, only the maximum equilibrium price has the highest welfare function level and highest market efficiency. And if the winner price is higher than the maximum expected value of the property right, the welfare function level is negative, it is so called "Winner's curse". At last, the effect of wealth power of a buyer for target property right on equilibrium price is initially discussed, which result conforms to common rule.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期299-305,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70573070)
关键词 产权拍卖 财富效用函数 边际效用零和方程 市场效率 财富效应 auction of property right wealth utility function weighted marginal utility zero-sum equation market efficiency wealth effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献78

共引文献79

同被引文献14

  • 1丁黎黎,徐寅峰,董玉成.基于风险补偿的占线拍卖策略[J].系统工程,2006,24(7):116-119. 被引量:5
  • 2Goldberg A, Hartline J, Wright A. Competitive auc- tions and digital goods[C]. Proceeding of twelfth Annu- al ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Washington, DC, January 7- 9,2001.
  • 3Bar-Yossef Z, Hildrum K, Wu F, Incentive-compatible online auctions for digital goods [C]. Proceedings of thirteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, San Francisco, January 6- 8,2002.
  • 4Goldberg A V , Hartline J D ,Karlin A R, et al. Com- petitive auction [J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2006,55(2) : 242-269.
  • 5Lavi R, Nisan N, Competitive analysis of incentive com- patible online auctions[J]. Theoretical Computer Sci- ence, 2004,310: 159-180.
  • 6Hajiaghayi M T, Kleinberg R, Parkes D. Adaptive lim- ited-supply online auctions[C]. Proceedings of the 5th. ACM. Electronic Commerce, New York, May 17- 20, 2004.
  • 7Awerbuch B, Azar Y, Meyerson A. Reducing truth- telling online mechanisms to online optimzation[C]. Proceedings of the thirty fifth annual. ACM. Theory of Computing, San Diego, California, June 9- 11,2003.
  • 8Babaioff M ,Immorlica N, Kempe D, et al. Online auc- tions and generalized secretary problem[J]. ACM SIGe- corn Exchanges, 2008,7(2) :1-11.
  • 9A1-Binali S. A risk- reward framework for the competi- tive analysis of financial games[J]. Algorithmica, 1999, 25: 99-115.
  • 10Gopal R D, Thompson S, Whinston A B. Managing risks in multiple online auctions., an options approach [J]. Decision Sciences, 2005, 36(3).. 397-425.

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部