期刊文献+

基于自组织神经网络和DEA的采购拍卖获胜者确定问题模型 被引量:6

Procurement auction WDP model based on SOM and DEA
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对采购拍卖中存在的品种多、数量大、利润差异大以及评价指标体系不合理等特点,首先在供应商投标后利用自组织神经网络和分包算法对供应商投标进行约减,以提高包内物品相似度、均衡供应商之间的竞争性、降低胜者确定问题算法的复杂度;接着利用数据包络分析中的C^2R模型对"约减"后的投标进行相对评价并确定最终获胜供应商,以解决传统指标体系评价方法中假设属性间不相关以及人为设定权重等不足.该模型为采购拍卖胜者确定问题的解决提出了新的思路,具有很好的实用性. There are some features existing in the procurement auction, for example huge number, multispecies, profit differences and irrational evaluation index systems. To solve these problems, this paper proposed the following model. Firstly, after vendors finishing biddings, we adopted self-organizing map (SOM) and bundle algorithm to simplify the vendors' biddings. This can enhance the goods' similarity within the bundles, balance the competition among suppliers, and reduce the complexity of the Winner Decision Problem (WDP) algorithm. Then, using the C2R model in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), we conducted a relative evaluation of simplified biddings and determined the final winner supplier. This can solve the problem of the uncorrelated property assumption and artificial weights in traditional evaluation index system method. Our model provides a new idea for WDP in the procurement auction. It has a good practicability.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期398-404,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70572023) 黑龙江自然科学基金重点项目(zd200803-01)
关键词 采购拍卖 自组织神经网络 分包 胜者确定问题 数据包络分析 procurement auction SOM bundle WDP DEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Schoenherr T,Mabert V A.Bundling for B2B procurement auction:Current state and best practices[J].International Journal of Integrated Supply Management,2006.2(3):189-213.
  • 2Schoenherr T,Mabert V A.The use of bundling in B2B online reverse auctions[J].Journal of Operations Management, 2008,26(1):81-95.
  • 3RothKopf M H,Pekec A,Harstad R M.Computationally manageable combinational auctions[J].Management Science,1998,44:1131-1147.
  • 4黄河,徐鸿雁,陈剑.多因素采购组合拍卖获胜者确定问题研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(7):27-33. 被引量:16
  • 5陈剑,黄河.基于树型结构的在线逆向组合拍卖模型[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(4):310-315. 被引量:13
  • 6Liu S L,Lai K K.A DEA approach for Winner determination for sealed-bid multi-attribute reverse auctions [C]//The Second International Workshop on Competitive Bidding and Auctions,Hong Kong:Global-Link Publisher,2004:27-39.
  • 7Thanassoutis E.Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis[M].Holland:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2001.
  • 8Carter C R,Kaufmann L,Beall S,et al.Reverse auctions-grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective [J].Transportation Research Part E,2004,40(3):229-254.
  • 9Mabert V A,Skeels J A.Internet reverse auctions:Valuable tool in experienced hands[J].Business Horizons. 2002,45(4):70-76.
  • 10Huang Z.Clustering large data sets with mixed numeric and categorical values[C]// Proc of the First Pacific Asia Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Conference,Singapore:World Scientific,1997:21-34.

二级参考文献14

  • 1陈剑,黄河.基于树型结构的在线逆向组合拍卖模型[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(4):310-315. 被引量:13
  • 2Cramton P C. The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment[J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,1997,6:431-495.
  • 3Rothkopf M H, Aleksandar Pekec, Ronald M Harstard. Computationally manageable combinational auctions[J]. Management Science,1998,44:1131-1147.
  • 4Sandholm T W. Approaches to winner determination in combinatorial auctions[J]. Decision Support Systems,2000,28:165-176.
  • 5Milgrom P. Putting auction theory to work: ascending auctions with package bidding[R]. Working Paper, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University,2001.
  • 6Leyton-Brown K, Shoham Y, Mo S T. An algorithm for multi-unit combinatorial auctions[R]. Working Paper, Computer Science Department, Stanford University,2000.
  • 7Carrie B, Segev A. Auctions on the internet: a field study[R]. Working Paper, Fisher Center for Management and Information Technology, University of California, Berkeley,1998.
  • 8Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the internet: what's being auctioned, and how[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics,2000,48(3):227-252.
  • 9Cramton P C. The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment[J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1997, 6 (fall) : 431 - 495.
  • 10Rothkopf M H, Aleksandar Pekec, Ronald M. Harstard. Computationally manageable combinational auctions[ J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(8) : 1131 - 1147.

共引文献30

同被引文献115

  • 1吴广谋,盛昭瀚.复合DEA方法及应用[J].管理工程学报,1993,7(4):216-220. 被引量:11
  • 2唐任仲,贾东浇,任午令,顾强.基于Agent的可重构供应链管理体系结构研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(10):1265-1269. 被引量:7
  • 3唐贤伦,仇国庆,李银国,曹长修.基于粒子群优化和SOM网络的聚类算法研究[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(5):31-33. 被引量:9
  • 4方少红,陈传波.面向供应链管理的行业信息系统问题域对象建模[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(5):130-132. 被引量:3
  • 5魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.218-257.
  • 6Gupta A., Mattarelli E., Satwik S., Broschak J. Use of Collaborative Technologies and Knowledge Sharing In Co-Located and Dis- tributed Teams: Towards the 24-h Knowledge Factory[ J ]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2009,3 (1) :101-109.
  • 7Stuart B., Peter B. Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners[ J]. Or- ganization Science, 2010,7 (3) : 89-96.
  • 8Stuart B., Ray E. R. Power, Status and Learning in Organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2011,2(5) :56-62.
  • 9Peter E. S., Alvin H. The Impact of Affective and Cognitive Trust on Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Learning [ J ]. TheLearning Organization, 2013,5( 1 ) :123-130.
  • 10Cantner U., Meder A. Regional Effects on Cooperative Innovation Activities and the Related Variety of Regional Knowledge Bases [J]. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2009,3(2) :156-161.

引证文献6

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部