期刊文献+

产品复杂性与主体互动模式对创新绩效的影响研究 被引量:5

The research on the effect of product complexity and agent patterned interactions on innovation performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 结合产品创新过程,借鉴生物演化的适应度景观概念,将系统中多主体的互动模式引入NK模型,运用模拟仿真考察产品复杂程度、小世界型与偏好依附型两种互动模式对合作网络中产品创新绩效的影响。结果表明,产品复杂性保持不变,在基于合作网络的产品创新过程中,当产品复杂性较低或较高时,偏好依附型互动模式优于小世界型互动模式;当产品复杂性适中时,小世界型互动模式优于偏好依附型互动模式。互动模式保持不变时,两种互动模式下的创新绩效都随着产品复杂性的增加而减少。 Combining with product innovation process,drawing on the concept of fitness landscape in biological evolution,this paper embedded patterned interactions among agents into an NK simulation model.Using simulation researched the effect of the complexity of product,small-world type interaction and preferential attachment type interaction on innovation performance.Results shown,holding fixed the complexity of product,preferential attachment type interaction with higher innovation performance when he level of product complexity are low and high;small-world type interaction with higher innovation performance when the level of product complexity are moderate.Holding fixed the pattern of interaction,with increasing the product complexity innovation performance reduced.
作者 张慧颖 王辉
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期294-300,共7页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 天津市科委科技发展战略研究计划项目(10ZLZLZF02100) 天津市哲学社会科学研究规划资助项目(TJGL10-942)
关键词 互动模式 NK模型 产品复杂性 创新绩效 pattern of interaction NK model product complexity innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Narayanan V K. Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage [ M ]. NewYork: Pearson, 2002.25. Hanaki N, Peterhansl A, Dodds P S, et al. Cooperation in evolving social networks [ J 1Manage Science, 2007, 53(7) :1036-1050.
  • 2Jong S. How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berleley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2006, 15 (2) : 251 -283.
  • 3柴国荣,宗胜亮,王璟珮.创新网络中的企业知识共享机理及其对策研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(2):295-298. 被引量:44
  • 4HartmannSonntag I. Modeling selforganization and innovation process in networks[ R]. ARXIV,2004.
  • 5冯锋,张瑞青,闫威.基于小世界网络模型的企业创新网络特征分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(9):87-91. 被引量:25
  • 6Hanaki N, Peterhansl A, Dodds P S, et al. Cooperation in evolving social networks [ J ]. Manage Science, 2007, 53(7) :1036-1050.
  • 7Esteve A, Ramon C M. Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 201 O, 35 ( 1 ) : 27-47.
  • 8Kauffman S A. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection In Evolution [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1993.10.
  • 9Wright S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution [ R ]. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, 1932. 356-366.
  • 10Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of small-world networks [ J ]. Nature, 1998,393 : 440-442.

二级参考文献15

  • 1薛伟贤,党兴华.网络环境下企业技术创新过程的特性分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(6):9-14. 被引量:5
  • 2邓丹,李南,田慧敏.基于小世界网络的NPD团队交流网络分析[J].研究与发展管理,2005,17(4):83-86. 被引量:35
  • 3J.C.Mitchell,Social Networks in Urban Situations[M].Manchester:Manchester University Press,1969.2
  • 4Albert R,Barabasi A L.Statistical mechanics of complex networks[J].Rev Mod Phys,2002,74(1):47-97
  • 5Liljeros F,Edling C R,Amaral L A N,et al.The web of human sexual contacts[J].Nature,2001,411:907-908
  • 6Jeong H,Tombor B,Albert R,et al.The large-scale organization of metabolic networks[J].Nature,2001,407:651-654
  • 7Mark Dodgson,Roy Rothwell.The Handbook of Industrial Innovation[M].Northampton,MA:Edward Elgar Press,1994:45-47
  • 8Kleinberg J.The small-world phenomenon and decentralized search[J].SIAM News,2004,37(3):1-2
  • 9Guare J.Six degrees of separation:A play[M].New York:Vintage Books,1990.
  • 10Watts D J,Strogatz S H.Collective dynamics of smallworld networks[J].Nature,1998,393(4):440-442

共引文献67

同被引文献94

  • 1王庆喜,宝贡敏.企业资源理论述评[J].南京社会科学,2004(9):6-11. 被引量:21
  • 2黄守坤,李文彬.产业网络及其演变模式分析[J].中国工业经济,2005(4):53-60. 被引量:52
  • 3董静,苟燕楠,封洁.基于不确定性和复杂性的创新项目管理模式研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(3):103-109. 被引量:23
  • 4饶扬德.企业资源整合过程与能力分析[J].工业技术经济,2006,25(9):72-74. 被引量:58
  • 5Levinthal D A, March J G. The myopia of learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14 ($2): 95 - 112.
  • 6Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay be- tween exploration and exploitation [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49 (4) : 693 - 706.
  • 7. Lin H E, Mcdonough E F, Lin S J, et al. Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: the role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity [ J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 50 (2) : 262 - 278.
  • 8Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger T R. Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexteri- ty, vacillation, and organizational performance [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33 (6SI) : 587 - 610.
  • 9Phelps C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alli- ance network structure and composition on firm explora-tory innovation [ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53 (4): 890 - 913.
  • 10Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda [J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38 (4): 1115 - 1166.

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部