期刊文献+

市场规模、利润侵蚀和争取多产品跨国企业的政策竞争 被引量:8

Market Size,Cannibalization and Policy Competition for a Multiproduct Multinational Firm
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文考虑两个国家(或者地区)的政府为争取一家外国跨国企业直接投资(FDI)而进行的政策竞争。两国拥有不同的市场规模,跨国公司生产两种水平差别化产品。文章证明:均衡时跨国企业的FDI选择取决于市场规模效应(marketsize effect)、两种产品间的利润侵蚀效应(cannibalization effect)和两国FDI补贴政策的共同作用。在此基础上,本文进一步得到了政府间FDI竞争的福利含义。特别地,本文还证明了:两国福利可能因参与FDI竞争而获得帕累托严格改进,或者发生帕累托严格损失。 This paper studies policy competition for a foreign-owned multiproduct monopolist firm producing two products that are horizontally differentiated between two countries of different size. This paper shows that the equilibrium outcome of FDI competition is determined by the interaction between the market size effect and the cannibalization effect, and countries' subsidy policies. Welfare effects of competition for FDI are derived; in particular, This paper shows that the competing countries may Pareto strictly gain from or Pareto strictly lose from FDI competition.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期106-119,共14页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 外国直接投资(FDI) 政策竞争 市场规模 利润侵蚀 福利 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy Competition Market Size Cannibalization Welfare
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Amerighi, O., and S. ,Peralta, 2010, "The Proximity-concentration Trade-off with Profit Shifting", Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 68, 90-101.
  • 2Barba Navaretti, G., A. J. , Venables, F. Barry, K. Ekholm, A. Falzoni , J. Haaland, K. -H. Midelfart, and A. Turrini. ,2004, Multinational Firms in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 3Baldwin, R. E. , and G. I. P. Ottaviano, 2001, "Multiproduct Multinationals and Reciprocal FDI Dumping" , Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54,429-448.
  • 4Barros, P. P. , and L. Cabral, 2000, "Competing for FDl", Review of International Economics, Vol. 8, 360-37l.
  • 5Behrens, K. , and P. M. Picard, 2008, "Bidding for Horizontal Multinationals" , Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 6,1244-1278.
  • 6Bernheim, B. D. , and M. D. Whinston, 1986, "Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, 1-3l.
  • 7Bjorvatn , K. , and C. Eckel, 2006, "Policy Competition for Foreign Direct Investment Between Asymmetric Countries", European Economic Review, Vol. 50, 1891-1907.
  • 8Bucovetsky , S., 1991, "Asymmetric Tax Competition", Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 30,167-181.
  • 9Bucovetsky, S. , and A. Haufler, 2008, "Tax Competition When Firms Choose Their Organizational Form: Should Tax Loopholes for Multinationals Be Closed?" , Journal of International Economics, Vol. 74, 188-201.
  • 10Chariton, A. , 2003, "Incentive Bidding for Mobile Investment: Economic Consequences and Potential Responses" , Mimeo.

同被引文献475

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部