期刊文献+

基于CVM的图书馆社会价值评估研究 被引量:2

A Research on the Library Social Value Based on CVM
原文传递
导出
摘要 条件价值评估法能评估公共物品的总经济价值,可弥补目前评估方法对难以量化的无形效益不能计算的不足。使用条件价值评估法对图书馆的社会效益进行评估,计算数据通过了检验,评估结果基本符合实际情况。 As the Contingent Valuation Method(CVM) can assess the total value of public goods,it will make up for the current assessment methods which are difficult to quantify the intangible value that can not be calculated.In this paper,the social value of the library is evaluated by CVM,the calculated data is tested,and the assessment results are consistent with the actual situation.
出处 《图书馆学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期17-19,25,共4页 Research on Library Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"基于绩效和成效测度的图书馆社会价值评估研究"(09XTQ001)的研究成果之一
关键词 条件价值评估法 图书馆 社会价值 评估 Contingent Valuation Method library social value assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1周慧.应用数学模型建立医学网站信息资源评价体系[J].医学信息学杂志,2006,27(3):181-183. 被引量:9
  • 2盛书平.图书馆服务质量模糊综合评判法[J].情报杂志,2006,25(12):73-74. 被引量:6
  • 3刘炜,楼向英,张春景.数字图书馆评估研究[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(5):21-24. 被引量:31
  • 4[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
  • 5[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
  • 6[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
  • 7[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 8[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
  • 9[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.
  • 10[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26.

共引文献362

同被引文献59

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部