期刊文献+

超声联合阳离子微泡造影剂体外增强基因转染 被引量:7

Ultrasound combined with cationic microbubbles enhanced in vitro gene transfer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声介导自制阳离子微泡破坏、增强基因转染的效果,并与普通脂质微泡对比,寻找一种更可靠、完善的基因载体工具。方法采用水浴机械震荡法,加入DC-胆固醇制备阳离子微泡,观察其物理特性并检测其体外载基因能力。将微泡和质粒DNA加入人脐静脉血管内皮细胞后分为6组,观测不同微泡浓度对细胞存活率的影响,应用荧光显微镜观察增强型绿色荧光蛋白的表达,流式细胞仪检测基因转染率,MTT法分析细胞存活率。结果自制阳离子微泡形态规整、分散度好,最大载基因率为39.7%。超声联合阳离子微泡能够增强基因转染,与普通脂质微泡组相比差异有统计学意义;随着微泡浓度增加,细胞损伤增大。结论采用自制阳离子微泡可在体外实现较高效率的基因转染。 Objective To observe the effects of ultrasound mediated destruction enhanced gene transfer with self-made cationic microbubbles comparing with common lipid microbubbles,so as to explore a more reliable and perfect gene vector.Methods Cationic lipid ultrasound microbubbles was prepared by mechanical oscillation with DC-cholesterol.Its physical properties and gene loading ability were detected.Microbubbles and plasmid DNA with HUVEC were divided into 6 groups,while radiation parameters were optimized.Cell viability of different concentration microbubbles was assessed.Expression of the enhanced green fluorescent protein was observed with fluorescent microscopy,and gene loading ability was detected with flow cytometry.The cell viability was measured using MTT assay.Results Regular shape and good dispersion were observed in self-made cationic microbubbles.The maximum ratio of loading gene of microbubbles was 39.7%.Between common lipid microbubbles and ultrasound mediated cationic microbubbles destruction,statistical differences were found.Decrease in viability of HUVEC was observed with increasing MB concentration.Conclusion The self-made cationic microbubbles have high gene loading ability,being able to enhance the efficiency of in vitro gene transfer.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期211-215,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(30900370 30900371) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81071158)
关键词 超声 微泡 造影剂 基因转移技术 Ultrasound Microbubbles Contrast media Gene transfer techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1景香香,王志刚.超声造影剂靶向性作用机制的研究进展[J].临床超声医学杂志,2003,5(6):359-360. 被引量:14
  • 2Suzuki R,Maruyama K.Effective in vitro and in vivo gene deliv-ery by the combination of liposomal bubbles(bubble liposomes)and ultrasound exposure.Methods Mol Boil,2010,605:473-486.
  • 3Phillips LC,Klibanov AL,Bowles DK,et al.Focused in vivo de-livery of plasmid DNA to the porcine vascular wall via intravascu-lar ultrasound destruction of microbubbles.J Vasc Res,2010,47(3):270-274.
  • 4苏琳,王志刚,李兴升,任建丽,汪朝霞,李雪霖,许川山,张茂惠.超声辐照微泡声学造影剂增强脂质体介导肝细胞基因转染的体外实验研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(10):721-723. 被引量:4
  • 5Suzuki R,Takizawa T,Negishi Y,et al.Effective gene delivery with novel liposomal bubbles and ultrasonic destruction technolo-gy.Int J Pharm,2008,354(1-2):49-55.
  • 6汪国忠,胡申江,郑哲岚,童紫莺,郑霞,姚宇玫,李江.载基因微泡介导β-galactosidase质粒转染心肌细胞的对照研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2004,13(11):857-861. 被引量:2
  • 7张云燕,李有强,骆书美,钟晓波,王六,王志刚.超声微泡介导pEGFP-N1质粒转染人牙周膜成纤维细胞的实验研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(5):745-748. 被引量:5
  • 8Caracciolo G,Callipo L,De Sanctis SC,et al.Surface adsorption of protein corona controls the cell internalization mechanism of DC-Chol-DOPE/DNA lipoplexes in serum.Biochim Biophys Ac-ta,2010,1798(3):536-543.
  • 9Christiansen JP,French BA,Klibanov AL,et al.Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cation-ic microbubbles.Ultrasound Med Biol,2003,29(12):1759-1767.
  • 10Karshafian R,Bevan PD,Williams R,et al.Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents:Effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.Ultrasound Med Biol,2009,35(5):847-860.

二级参考文献49

共引文献21

同被引文献59

  • 1Suzuki R, Oda Y, Utoguchi N, et al. Progress in the develop- ment of ultrasound-mediated gene delivery systems utilizing nano- and microbubbles. J Control Release, 2011,149(1):36-41.
  • 2Li YS, Davidson E, Reid CN, et al. Optimising ultrasound-medi- ated gene transfer (sonoporation) in vitro and prolonged expres- sion of a transgene in vivo: Potential applications for gene therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett, 2009,273 (1) : 62-69.
  • 3Suzuki R, Namai E, Oda Y, et al. Cancer gene therapy by IL-12 gene delivery using liposomal bubbles and tumoral ultrasound ex- posure. J Control Release, 2010,142(2) :245-250.
  • 4Kinoshita M, Hynynen K. Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: The importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2007,359(4) :860- 865.
  • 5He CX, Tabata Y, Gao JQ. Non-viral gene delivery carrier and its three-dimensional transfection system. Int J Pharm, 2010, 386 (1-2) :232-242.
  • 6Funhoff AM, van Nostrum CF, Lok MC, et al. Cationic poly- methacrylates with covalently linked membrane destabilizing pep- tides as gene delivery vectors. J Control Release, 2005,101(1-3) : 233-246.
  • 7Shim MS, Kwon YJ. Stimuli-responsive polymers and nanomate-rials for gene delivery and imaging applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2012,64(11) :1046-1059.
  • 8Kuo JH, Jan MS, Sung KC. Evaluation of the stability of poly mer-based plasmid DNA delivery systems after ultrasound expo sure. Int J Pharm, 2003,257(1 2):75-84.
  • 9Deshpande MC, Prausnitz MR. Synergistic effect of ultrasound and PEI on DNA transfection in vitro. J Control Release, 2007, 118(1):126 135.
  • 10Cavalli R, Bisazza A, Trotta M, et al. New chhosan nanobub bles for uhrasound mediated gene delivery: Preparation and in vitro characterization. Int J Nanomedicine, 2012,7:3309-3318.

引证文献7

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部