期刊文献+

前列腺穿刺活检单针阳性患者前列腺内癌灶分布特点 被引量:7

Distribution characteristics of cancerous foci in the prostate among patients undergoing single positive core biopsy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对前列腺穿刺活检单针阳性并接受根治性手术治疗的前列腺癌患者的手术标本病理结果进行回顾分析,了解前列腺内癌灶的分布情况。方法:对我院37例经直肠前列腺穿刺活检,单针阳性确诊为前列腺癌并接受前列腺癌根治术的患者手术前后资料进行比较,评价活检与术后病理结果的非一致性,分析肿瘤总体被低估的可能危险因素。结果:多数患者(26/37)术后病理证实肿瘤呈多灶性分布;术后Gleason评分7~9分患者(21/37)所占比例明显升高;术前临床分期明显被低估;单针中癌组织比例大是术前临床分期被低估的可能危险因素;PSAD>0.2μg/L是肿瘤总体被低估的可能危险因素;前列腺体积较大(体积≥40 ml)时肿瘤多灶性分布的可能性增大。结论:前列腺穿刺活检单针阳性患者的肿瘤可能被低估;其前列腺癌灶的分布具有多灶性特点。 Objective: To determine the distribution characteristics of cancerous foci in the prostate by retrospective analysis on the radical prostatectomy(RP) samples from patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by single positive core biopsy and treated by RP.Methods: Thirty-seven patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by ultrasound-guided biopsy and single positive core biopsy underwent RP.We reviewed the pre-and post-operative data of the patients,compared the results of biopsies and pathological examination of the RP samples,and analyzed the factors that led to the underestimation of the overall prostate cancer risks.Results: Post-operative pathological results showed multifocal distribution of the tumors in 70% of the patients(26/37),and obviously increased Gleason score(7-9) in 56%(21/37).The clinical stages of the tumors had been significantly underestimated preoperatively.The underestimation of their clinical stages might be due to a larger proportion of cancer tissues in a single positive core biopsy,and that of the overall cancer risks attributed to PSAD0.2 μg/L.Larger prostate volume(≥40 ml) increased the possibility of multifocal distribution.Conclusion: The risk of prostate cancer diagnosed by single positive core biopsy might be underestimated,and the cancerous foci were characterized by multifocal distribution in the prostate.
出处 《中华男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2012年第2期155-159,共5页 National Journal of Andrology
关键词 前列腺癌 单针阳性 肿瘤临床分期 病理分级 prostate cancer single positive core biopsy clinical tumor stage pathological grade
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Guzzo TJ,Vira M,Hwang WT,et al.Impact of multiple biopsycores on predicting final tumor volume in prostate cancer detectedby a single microscopic focus of cancer on biopsy.Urology,2005,66(2):361-365.
  • 2钟晨阳,刘明,张力青,万奔.前列腺癌分期方法的临床评价[J].中华男科学杂志,2003,9(2):100-102. 被引量:2
  • 3李昕,夏昊,周利群,那彦群.前列腺癌患者术前分期分级偏低的相关危险因素[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(5):315-317. 被引量:10
  • 4Heidenreich A,Bellmunt J,Bolla M,et al.EAU guidelines onprostate cancer.Part 1:Screening,diagnosis,and treatment ofclinically localised disease.Eur Urol,2011,59(1):61-71.
  • 5Noguchi M, Stamey TA, Mcneal JE, et al. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prosta- tectomy specimens: Lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. J Urol, 2001, 166 ( 1 ) : 104-110.
  • 6Knopick CR,Barber TD,Pansare V,et al.Pathologic character-istics of contralateral prostate cancer among patients with a singlepositive core biopsy.J Urol,2009,181(4 Suppl):176.
  • 7Scales CD Jr,Presti JC Jr,Kane CJ,et al.Predicting unilateralprostate cancer based on biopsy features:Implications for focalablative therapy—results from the search database.J Urol,2007,178(4Pt1):1249-1252.
  • 8Grossfeld GD,Chang JJ,Broering JM,et al.Under staging andunder grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoingradical prostatectomy:Results from the cancer of the prostatestrategic urologic research endeavor database.J Urol,2001,165(3):851-856.
  • 9Thong AE,Shikanov S,Katz MH,et al.A single microfocus(5%or less)of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy—can we predictadverse pathological outcomes?J Urol,2008,180(6):2436-2440.
  • 10Lee AK,Doytchinova T,Chen MH.Can the core length involvedwith prostate cancer identify clinically insignificant disease in lowrisk patients diagnosed on the basis of a single positive core?UrolOncol,2003,21(2):123-127.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Amy VK, Gary DG, David MS, et al. Use of imaging tests for staging newly diagnosed prostate cancer: trends from the CaPSURE database[J]. J Urol, 1998, 160(12): 2102-2106.
  • 2[2]Gerard JO, Robert WV, Roberto O, et al. Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 1997, 158(9): 687-698.
  • 3[3]Anthony VD, Richard W, Malkowicz SB, et al. Combination of the preoperative PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, predict early PSA failure in men with clinically localized prostate cancer[J]. Urology, 2000, 55(4): 572-577.
  • 4[4]Badalament RA, Miller MC, Peller PA, et al. An algorithm for predicting nonorgan confined prostate cancer using the results obtained from sextant core biopsies with prostate specific antigen level[J]. J Urol, 1996, 156(4): 1375-1380.
  • 5[5]Peller PA, Young DC, Marmaduke CD, et al. Sextant prostate biopsies A histopathologic correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens[J]. Cancer, 1995, 75(2): 530-538.
  • 6[6]Epstein JI, Partin AW, Potter SR, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters[J]. Urology, 2000,56(2):283-288.
  • 7Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics,2007. CA Cancer J Clin, 2007, 57 ( 1 ) : 43..66.
  • 8Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA, 1997, 277 (18): 1445-1451.
  • 9Seaman EK, Whang IS, Cooner W, et al. Predictive value of prostate specific antigen density for the presence of mierometastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Urology, 1994, 43 (5) : 645-648.
  • 10Taneja SS, Hsu EI, Cheli CD, et al. Complexed prostate specific antigen as a staging tool: Results based on a muhicenter prospective evaluation of complexed prostate specific antigen in cancer diagnosis. Urology, 2002, 60( 4 Supp 1) : 10-17.

共引文献30

同被引文献48

  • 1查月琴,沈卫东,林和平,沈玲玲,陈卫国,王阿军,侯建全.经直肠超声造影灌注方式在前列腺良恶性病变中的初步研究[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2008,18(4):601-603. 被引量:12
  • 2范海涛,王尧,王凯臣,王伟华,计国义,高洪文,潘淑琴,孔祥波,赵学俭,桑原正明.经直肠B超引导下前列腺穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用价值(附658例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(6):435-437. 被引量:17
  • 3唐杰,王知力,李俊来,罗渝昆,汪伟,徐建宏,石怀银.良性前列腺增生超声造影的初步研究[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(7):584-587. 被引量:17
  • 4Paul A.Kay,Richard A.Robb,David G.Bostwick.Prostate cancer microvessels: a novel method for three‐dimensional reconstruction and analysis[J].Prostate.1998(4)
  • 5梁磊,张彤,孟繁林.经会阴前列腺24针穿刺法对早期前列腺癌的诊断价值.中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,7(9):964-968.
  • 6Ahrens MJ,Bertin PA,Vonesh EF,et al.PSA enzymatic activity:A new biomarker for assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness.The Prostate,2013,73(16):1731-1737.
  • 7Alenda O, Ploussard G, Mouracade P, et al. Impact of the primary Gleason pattern on biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cohort of 1,248 patients with Gleason 7 tumors [ J ]. World J Urol,2011,29 ( 5 ) : 671-676. DOI: 10. 1007/s00345-010-0620-9.
  • 8Amin A, Partin A, Epstein JI. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary Pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy [ J 1. J Urol, 2011,186(4) : 1286-1290. DOI: 10. 1016/j. juro. 2011.05. 075.
  • 9Rieardo Kupka da S, Dall' Oglio MF, Sant' Ana AC, et al. Cansingle positive core prostate cancer at biopsy be considered a low- risk disease after radical prostatectomy? [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2013,39 (6) : 800-807. DOI : 10. 1590/S1677-5538. IBJU. 2013. 06.05.
  • 10Trock B J, Guo CC, Gonzalgo ML, et al. Tertiary G|eason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system[J]. J Urol,2009,182(4) :1364- 1370. DOI: 10. 1016/j. juro. 2009.06. 048.

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部