期刊文献+

神经刺激器引导下连续肌间沟臂丛阻滞用于肩部手术术后镇痛效果观察 被引量:4

Clinical study of neurostimulation-guided continuous interscalene brachial plexus blocks for postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价神经刺激器引导下连续肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞用于肩部手术后镇痛的临床效果。方法 30例肩部手术患者应用抽签法随机分为A组(连续臂丛神经阻滞组)和B组(患者自控静脉镇痛组),每组15例。B组在神经刺激器引导下行单次肌间沟臂丛阻滞,术后行自控静脉芬太尼镇痛。A组在神经刺激器引导下行连续肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞镇痛,同时合用与B组患者相似的自控静脉芬太尼镇痛作为补救措施。观察两组患者术后不同时段的疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分(静息及运动)、芬太尼用量、不良反应及患者满意度。结果 A组术后12、16、24、32、40、48 h的静息及运动时的VAS评分均显著低于相应时间段的B组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。A组术后8~48 h各时段的芬太尼消耗量及术后48 h的芬太尼总消耗量均显著小于B组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。A组的镇痛满意率(13/15)显著高于B组(3/15)(P<0.01)。结论神经刺激器引导下连续肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞能有效缓解肩部手术后疼痛,减少阿片类镇痛药物的使用量,提高患者的舒适度。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of neurostimulation-guided continuous interscalene brachial plexus blocks for postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery. Methods Thirty patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to either a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block group (A group, n = 15) or patient-con- trolled intravenous analgesia group (B group, n = 15). In the B group, intravenous PCA was provided with fentanyl. In the A group, continuous brachial plexus block were performed via interscalene approach under neurostimulation guidance, and intravenous PCA was also provided for supplemental analgesia. The pain scores at still and on movement on visual analogue scale (VAS), patient satisfaction rate, side effects and opioid consumption were observed in the two groups after surgery. Results Pain scores at still and on movement were lower in the A group than those in the B group at 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48 h after operation (P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01). The opioid consumption within 8-48 h after operation and the total opioid consumption were both significantly lower in the A group than in the B group (P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01). Patients in the A group had a higher satisfaction rate than that in the B group (13/15 vs 3/15, P 〈 0.01). Conclusion Neurostimulation-guid- ed continuous interscalene brachial plexus blocks can relieve postoperation pain and decrease the need of opioids after shoulder surgery, thus improving the statisfactory degree of the patients.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2012年第5期71-73,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 连续臂丛阻滞 术后镇痛 神经刺激器引导 肩部手术 Continuous brachial plexus block Postoperative analgesia Neurostimulation-guided Shoulder surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ivani G,Mossetti V. Continuous central and perineural infusions for postoperative pain control in children[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2010,23 (5) :637-642.
  • 2Howell SM ,Unger MW, Colson JD,et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of neck hematoma and block salvage after failed neurostimulation-guided interscalene block[J]. J Clin Anesth ,2010,22(7):560-561.
  • 3De Tran QH, Clemente A,Doan J,et al. Brachial plexus blocks: a review of approaches and techniques[J]. Can J Anaesth,2007,54(8) :662-674.
  • 4文康珍,黎文安,何斌.介质损耗变频测量仪原理与实现[J].工业仪表与自动化装置,2003(3):36-38. 被引量:7
  • 5顾华华,车薛华,李佩盈,梁伟民.刺激电流大小对上肢肘以下外科手术患者锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞成功率的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(21):1470-1473. 被引量:11
  • 6Roch JJ,Sharrock NE, Neudachin L. Interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery:a proximal paresthesia is effective[J]. Anesth Analg, 1992,75 (3) :386-388.
  • 7Lecamwasam H ,Mayfield J ,Rosow L,et al. Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavieular block[J]. Anesth Analg,2006, 102(5) : 1564-1568.
  • 8Pham Dang C ,Guilley J ,Dernis L,et al. Is there any need for expanding the perineural space before catheter placement in continuous femoral nerve blocks?[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2006,31 (5) : 393-400.
  • 9Richman JM,Liu SS,Courpas G,et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysisfJ]. Anesth Analg, 2006,102 (1) :248-257.

二级参考文献12

  • 1吕延锋,钟连宏.介损测量技术及其最新发展[J].高电压技术,1996,22(2):53-55. 被引量:29
  • 2刘跃南 邱昌容.电气绝缘测试技术[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1981..
  • 3何立民.MCS-51系列单片机应用系统设计[M].北京航空航天大学出版社,1990..
  • 4Wilson JL, Brown DL. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique. Anesth Analg, 1998,87:870-873.
  • 5Desroches J. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observation study of 150 patients. Can J Anesth, 2003,50:3,253-257.
  • 6Rodriguez J, Barcenal M. A comparison of single versus multiple injections on the extent of anesthesia with coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg, 2004,99:1225-1230.
  • 7Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Dumont C. An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique. Anesth Analg, 2001,93:436-441.
  • 8Minville V, N' Guyen L. A modified coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using a double-stimulation technique in 300 patients. Anesth Analg, 2005,100:263-265.
  • 9Zbigniew J, Koseielniak-Nielson Henrik, Rasmussen. Clinical evaluation of the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block developed by MRI studies. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2005,30:329-334.
  • 10Pither CE, Raj P, Ford DJ. The use of peripheral nerve stimulator for regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth, 1985,10: 49-58.

共引文献16

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部