期刊文献+

论王安石义利观的历史评价

On the History Evaluation of Wang Anshi's Viewpoint on Justice and Interests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对王安石义利观的评价,有"道义论"否定性的评价和"功利论"肯定性的评价。古代"道义论"的评价主要来自两个方面:一是封建专制主义"政统"论;一是理学家"道统"论。朱熹从"道统"论中"道问学"角度来否定,陆九渊则从"道统"论的"尊德性"的角度来否定。"功利论"肯定性的评价有三种:古代功利论、近代资产阶级功利论、马克思主义功利论。如果说道义论是从传统"义"的角度来否定王安石的义利观,那么,功利论则是从"利"的角度来肯定。 The history evaluation of viewpoint on justice and interests by Wang Anshi is mainly as follows: negative evaluation of ancient "moral theory"and positive evaluation "utilitarian theory".Ancient "moral theory"comes mainly from two aspects: On the one hand,negative evaluation of the feudal autocratic,"political unification",on the other hand,the negation of "Dao unification" of Neo-Confucianism.Zhuxi conducted negation from the perspective of "Dao learning" within "Dao unification",and Lu Jiuyuan conducted criticism from the angle of "Respect Virtue" "Road unification" within "Dao unification".There are three kinds of positive evaluation in Utilitarian theory,Ancient utilitarian theory,such as Chengliang and Yeshi;modern bourgeois utilitarian theory,for example,Liang Qichao and utilitarian theory of Marxism,for instance,Deng Guangming.The moral theory negated Wang Anshi's viewpoint on justice and interests from the perspective of traditional "justice",while utilitarian theory negated it from the perspective of justice.
作者 欧阳辉纯
出处 《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第6期33-38,共6页 Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
关键词 王安石 义利观 道义论 功利论 Wang Anshi viewpoint on justice and interests moral theory utilitarian theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1977..
  • 2余继登.典故纪闻[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
  • 3王安石全集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.
  • 4杨慎.升庵全集(第四册)[M].上海:商务印书馆,1937.
  • 5王夫之.宋论[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
  • 6黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 7黄宗羲.宋元学案[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 8二程集[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 9司马光.资治通鉴[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 10.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983..

共引文献815

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部