期刊文献+

MMPI偏执分量表的计算机自适应测验可行性分析

Using the Computerized Adaptive Test to Analyze the Feasibility of MMPI Paranoid Subscale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对MMPI偏执分量表的CAT研究的可行性进行探索,并在普通人群和病人中检验CAT测验的结果。方法:首先采用项目反应理论对Pa分量表的单维性进行检验,其次依据项目反应理论挑选项目,形成用于CAT的删减版Pa-D,最后在病人和普通人中验证CAT的可行性。结果:①Pa和Pa-D都能满足单维性的假设,可以用IRT分析项目。②Pa-D的项目参数在合理可接受的范围内。结论:Pa和Pa-D均满足单维性,且删除题目未对测验的信息造成明显的影响。采用后验CAT模拟可以节省一半的题目。 Objective: In this paper,the item response theory was used to analyze the Pa subscale of MMPI.And the item response theory was used to explore the feasibility of the post-hoc CAT of this subscale.In order to test the effect of the post-hoc CAT,the normal people and the patients were the sample used in this study.Methods: There were three steps in total.First,the unidimensionality of the scale was assessed and the item parameters were estimated.Second,according to the parameters,good items were selected to form the Pa-D scale.Third,the effect of the post-hoc CAT was tested in patients and normal people.Results: Both Pa and Pa-D could meet the unidimensional assumption,and could be analyzed under the IRT framework.Pa-D item parameters were in the acceptable range.Conclusion: Pa and Pa-D are unidimensional,and the test information is not obviously influenced by those deleted items.The post-hoc CAT simulation can save half items.
作者 任芬 戴晓阳
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期15-17,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 偏执分量表 CAT IRT Paranoid subscale CAT IRT
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1肖利军,苗丹民,王京生,罗正学,皇甫恩.《中国简式明尼苏达多相人格问卷》与新兵社会适应性评价[J].第四军医大学学报,2003,24(21):1996-1999. 被引量:24
  • 2Dahlstrom WG, Robert PA. A Shortened Version of the MMPI-2 Assessment, 2000, 7:131.
  • 3Carlton SG, Cherry AL. MMPI-2 Short Form: Psychometric Characteristics in a Neuropsychological Setting Assessment, 2001, 8:213.
  • 4Forbey JD. Validation of the MMPI-2 Computerized Adap- tive Version (MMPI-2-CA) in a Correctional Intake Facility Psychological Services, 2009, 6(4): 279-292.
  • 5Biskin BH, Kolotkin RL. Effect of computerized administra- tion on scores for the MMPI. Applied Psychological Mea- surement, 1997, 1:543-549.
  • 6Roper B, Ben-Porath Y, Butcher J. Comparability of com- puterized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI- 2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1991, 57:278-290.

二级参考文献4

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部