期刊文献+

Remuneration Reforms in Public Sector: A Case of Russian Healthcare

Remuneration Reforms in Public Sector: A Case of Russian Healthcare
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In 2008 remuneration reform for public sector was introduced in Russia. Its main idea was to implement P4P principle well-known in business, including more flexible approach to wage setting. This paper presents an attempt to estimate an influence of the new remuneration system (NRS) on earnings level, inequalities and job motivation. The estimates are based on microdata of monitoring survey of healthcare economic problems conducted in Russia in 2009 and 2010. The extended specification of Mincer earning equation and probit-models were used. One could observe increasing wage rates and earning inequalities within healthcare institutions adopted NRS though worker's experience and regional economic differences remain significant wage determining factors. As it occurs, NRS is widely adopted by large regional and central hospitals while smaller health care institutions show less enthusiasm in implementing reform. Obviously, the larger institutions have more money and better educated administrative staff to introduce the new system. Those chief physicians who adopted NRS point out a positive correlation between earnings and individual input. At the same time, those committed to old principles of wage setting more often note declining job turnover. This latter result could possibly indicate negative personnel sorting, less productive workers tending to stay with employer who doesn't assess their performance. As concerns anticipated NRS results such as increasing motivation and quality of health services, the evidence is still ambiguous.
出处 《Chinese Business Review》 2012年第1期109-118,共10页 中国经济评论(英文版)
关键词 remuneration system pay for performance health care institutions job motivation 医疗机构 公共部门 俄罗斯 改革 设置原则 实名制 薪酬制度 经济问题
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Akerlof, G. A., & Yellen, J. L. (1986). Efficiency wages models of labor market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Baumol, W. J. (1967). The macroeconomics of unbalanced growth. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
  • 3Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effect of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42 25-40.
  • 4Cowherd, D., & Levine, D. I. (1992). Product quality and pay equity between low-level employees and top management: an investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), June, 302-320;.
  • 5Katz, L. F. (1986). Efficiency wage theories: A partial evaluation. NBER working papers, 1906. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • 6Lazear, E. D. (1995). Personnel economics. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
  • 7Maynard, A. (2006). Incentives in health care: The shift in emphasis from the implicit to the explicit. In C. A. Dubois, M. McKee, & E. Nolte (Eds.), Human resources for health in Europe (pp. 140-154). Open University Press, McGraw-tlill Education.
  • 8Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281-302.
  • 9Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: NBER Press.
  • 10Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Jenkins, G. D. (1997). A drop in the bucket: When is a pay raise a pay raise? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 117-137.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部