摘要
从逻辑理性和协商民主的双重角度看,讨论与辩论具有不同的政策工具意义,在特定的情形下,政策辩论往往成为更自然、更方便的选择。20年来,国际气候政策制定过程具有突出的政策辩论特征,从民主理论、逻辑与现实性角度来看,政策辩论应该成为国际气候政策制定的重要工具选择,改善国际气候政策辩论制度势在必行。从当前实践需要看,政策讨论与政策辩论在促进公正而有效的国际气候政策制定,构建全球政治文明的经典样本与范例,提供政策制定过程辩论工具选择的例证与经验等方面具有重要的意义。
From dual perspective of logical rationality and consultative democracy, discussion and debate have different meanings as policy tools. Under certain circumstances, policy debate often becomes a more natural and convenient choice. For the last 20 years, the international climate policy-making process has shown the prominent features of policy debate, and policy debate should become the impoi'tant tool for selection in interna- tional climate policy-making from the perspective of democratic theory, logic and pragmatic. It is inevitable to improve system of the international chmate policy debate. From the point of view of the current practical de- mand, policy discussion and policy debate are of vital significance for promoting establishment of fair and effective international climate policy-making, constructing the model of global political civilization and providing examples and experience of tool selection in the process of policy-making.
出处
《阅江学刊》
2012年第1期30-37,共8页
Yuejiang Academic Journal
基金
江苏省社会科学院课题"讨论
辩论与协商民主"(Z0701)
关键词
政策讨论
政策辩论
政策工具
协商民主
国际气候政策
policy discussion
policy debate
policy tool
consultative democracy
international climate policy