科学技术、生产力、现代化的本质特征与“未来景象” 被引量：4

On the Essential Feature and Envisioned Future of Modernization

下载PDF

导出

摘要现代化不是一个从抽象思维中产生出来的理论概念,应当从历史经验的角度探寻其本质。现代化不仅仅是科学技术和生产力的发展,不只是经济增长,还需包括社会、政治、思想的现代化。非西方社会的现代化要在社会变革、思想文化的传承与创新、经济和政治制度创新、科学技术创新等方面做新的探索。当今世界发展的趋势和未来前景,是"世界体系"的扩展或曰"全球化"。全球化的大趋势对国家主权形成冲击,但主权国家仍然是世界体系的基本结构、基本格局。当前国际政治经济格局和全球化趋势给中国人带来难得的历史性机遇,然而,来自国外和内部的各种困难、挑战也将与机遇相伴随。 Modernization is not an abstract concept but a real process.We should search for its essential feature from the historical experiences.Modernization does not mean only the development of productive power,or economic growth,developments in social,political and ideological aspects are all important.Modernization in the non-western world needs new ideas in search of new routes for social change,cultural inheritance and innovation,economic and political system innovations,and innovation of science and technology.The future perspective of modern world is the expansion of the ＂world system＂,or ＂globalization＂,but the nation-state system is still the basic structure.Modernization in China today is facing a good opportunity as well as many difficulties.

作者董正华

机构地区北京大学世界现代化进程研究中心中国人权研究会中国科学院中国现代化研究中心

出处《理论与现代化》 CSSCI 2012年第1期5-11,共7页 Theory and Modernization

关键词科学技术生产力本质未来景象 Science and technology Power of production Essential feature Envisioned future of modernization

分类号 D619 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1周恩来选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.
2伯曼.-切坚固的东西都烟消云散了-现代性体验[M].周宪等译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.19-20.
3勒纳.现代化[A].国际社会科学百科全书[Z].1968.386.
4马克思.资本论第-卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.第-版序言.
5阿里夫.德里克,吕增奎,王宁.当代视野中的现代性批判[J].南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）,2007,44(6):50-59. 被引量：7
6马蒂内利.全球现代性[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010.13.
7项观奇.社会主义现代化的提法是错误的[EB/OL]http://www.maoflag.net/?action-viewthread-tid-581459.html.2011-06-02.
8许良英等编.走近爱因斯坦[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.2005.69-70.105.125.
9马克思恩格斯全集第3卷[M]．人民出版社，北京，1960(第24页)．
10温家宝.未来中国的走向在英国皇家学会的演讲[EB/OL].http://news.ifeng.com/mainland/special/wenjiabao-fangouzhousangudcontent-3/detail_2011_06r28r/2898750shtml,201l_06-27.

二级参考文献23

1Jerry H. Bentley, “Beyond Modernocentrism: Toward Fresh Visions of the Glohal Past,” in Victor H. Mair( ed), Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'l Press, 2006, pp. 17 - 29.
2Edmund Burke, Ⅲ, “Islamic History as World History : Marshall Hodgson, The Venture of Islam,” International Journal of Middle East Studies Vol. 10, No. 2 ( May 1979), pp. 241 - 264.
3Edmund Burke, Ⅲ, “Islamic History as World History : Marshall Hodgson, The Venture of Islam,” International Journal of Middle East Studies Vol. 10, No. 2 ( May 1979), pp. 250.
4Prasenjit Duara, Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
5Paul A. Cohen, Discovering History in China, New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
6Andre Gunder Frank, Re-Orient: Global Economy in the Asian Age, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.
7Bin Wong, China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of the European Experience, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.
8Kenneth Pomeranz, The Great Divergence : China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2000.
9Giovanni Arrighi, Takeshi Hamashita and Mark Selden (ed.), The Resurgence of East Asia: 500, 150 and 50 Year Perspectives, London and New York: Routledge, 2003.
10Mark Elvin, The Pattern of the Chinese Past (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1973)