期刊文献+

论罗素三个悖论的解决 被引量:1

On Resolutions of Russell's Three Paradoxes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 解决悖论的可能的途径有两种,一种是特设的理论路线,一种是面向事物自身的非特设路线,但特设理论路线困难重重,而非特设路线的理论前景光明。由此,进一步可以对罗素的三个悖论进行真实意义上的解决,将这三个所谓悖论排除在可能的逻辑矛盾之外,从而将其从悖论的行列中去除。 Possible approach to resolve paradoxes is divided into two kinds:one is a specially supposed theoretical route,and the other is a non specially supposed route towards the things themselves.However,the former approach has various difficulties,while the latter has a bright prospect.Hence,we can further resolve Russell's three paradoxes in the real sense,that is to exclude these three so-called paradoxes outside of possible logical contradiction,so as to abolish them from the sphere of paradoxes.
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期27-32,共6页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 逻辑 矛盾 悖论 罗素 logic contradiction paradox Russell
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1苏珊·哈克.罗毅,张家龙译.逻辑哲学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.

共引文献23

同被引文献5

  • 1D. M. Borchert. Encyclopedia of Philosophy : 2nd edition[M].Michigan : Thomson Gale, 2005.
  • 2E. Craig.Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy[M].London and New York:Routledge, 1998.
  • 3R. Audi.Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy : Second edition[M].Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 4Andrea Cantini.Paradoxes and Contemporary Logic[M/OL].Edward N. Zalta.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.URL=<http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/fall2014/entries/paradoxes-contemporary-logic/>.
  • 5R. M. Sainsbury.Paradoxes : 3rd edition[M].Cambfidge : Cambridge University Press, 2009.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部