期刊文献+

Influential factors and effect evaluation of the intra-operative puncture biopsy for pancreatic masses

Influential factors and effect evaluation of the intra-operative puncture biopsy for pancreatic masses
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background It is a challenge for the surgeons to accurately diagnose the pancreatic masses preoperatively,which decides the choice of surgical managements and subsequently results in different survivor outcomes,operative complications,and mortality rates.The purposes of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic role that intra-operative puncture biopsy may play in pancreatic masses and to explore the relevant factors influencing the diagnosis.Methods A retrospective study was performed on 94 in-patients admitted to Peking University First Hospital for pancreatic masses during the period from June 1994 to December 2007.They all underwent intra-operative puncture biopsy during exploratory laparotomy.The sensitivity and specificity of intra-operative puncture biopsy were calculated and the relevant factors to the diagnosis of biopsy were selected for the statistical analysis.Results The overall sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of intra-operative puncture biopsy were 76.0%,94.7%,98.3% and 50.0%,respectively.The analysis of bivariate correlations showed that the size of the pancreatic masses (P=-0.000),the number of puncture biopsies (P=0.000),and the presence of pancreatic fibrosis (P=-0.012) had statistic significance for the diagnosis.But the multivariate analysis identified the size of the pancreatic masses (P=0.004) and the number of puncture biopsies (P=0.000) as independent predictive factors for intra-operative puncture biopsy.In addition,as the number of puncture biopsies increased,the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis was improved (P=0.000).The sensitivity and specificity of intra-operative puncture biopsy were found to be lower for the pancreatic masses less than 25 mm compared with the masses larger than 25 mm (P=0.000).It was noted,however,that even if the masses were less than 25 mm,the sensitivity and specificity could be improved significantly as the number of puncture biopsies reached 3 to 6 (P=0.007).Conclusions Intra-operative puncture biopsy is simple and accurate for qualitatively differentiating various types of pancreatic masses.Three to 4 biopsies could significantly improve the diagnostic effect for pancreatic masses,even if the masses are less than 25 mm in size. Background It is a challenge for the surgeons to accurately diagnose the pancreatic masses preoperatively,which decides the choice of surgical managements and subsequently results in different survivor outcomes,operative complications,and mortality rates.The purposes of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic role that intra-operative puncture biopsy may play in pancreatic masses and to explore the relevant factors influencing the diagnosis.Methods A retrospective study was performed on 94 in-patients admitted to Peking University First Hospital for pancreatic masses during the period from June 1994 to December 2007.They all underwent intra-operative puncture biopsy during exploratory laparotomy.The sensitivity and specificity of intra-operative puncture biopsy were calculated and the relevant factors to the diagnosis of biopsy were selected for the statistical analysis.Results The overall sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of intra-operative puncture biopsy were 76.0%,94.7%,98.3% and 50.0%,respectively.The analysis of bivariate correlations showed that the size of the pancreatic masses (P=-0.000),the number of puncture biopsies (P=0.000),and the presence of pancreatic fibrosis (P=-0.012) had statistic significance for the diagnosis.But the multivariate analysis identified the size of the pancreatic masses (P=0.004) and the number of puncture biopsies (P=0.000) as independent predictive factors for intra-operative puncture biopsy.In addition,as the number of puncture biopsies increased,the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis was improved (P=0.000).The sensitivity and specificity of intra-operative puncture biopsy were found to be lower for the pancreatic masses less than 25 mm compared with the masses larger than 25 mm (P=0.000).It was noted,however,that even if the masses were less than 25 mm,the sensitivity and specificity could be improved significantly as the number of puncture biopsies reached 3 to 6 (P=0.007).Conclusions Intra-operative puncture biopsy is simple and accurate for qualitatively differentiating various types of pancreatic masses.Three to 4 biopsies could significantly improve the diagnostic effect for pancreatic masses,even if the masses are less than 25 mm in size.
机构地区 Peking Univ First Hosp
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第2期182-187,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 PANCREAS puncture biopsy INTRA-OPERATIVE NEOPLASMS pancreas puncture biopsy intra-operative neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Chen Y, Zheng B, Robbins DH, Lewin DN, Mikhitarian K, Graham A, et al. Accurate discrimination of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis using multimarker expression data and samples obtained by minimally invasive fine needle aspiration. Int J Cancer 2007; 120:1511-1517.
  • 2Micames C, Jowell PS, White R, Paulson E, Nelson R, Morse M, et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 690-695.
  • 3Wray C J, Ahmad SA, Matthews JB, Lowy AM. Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent controversies and current practice. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1626-1641.
  • 4Barone JE. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol 2008; 17: 139-144.
  • 5Khalid A, Nodit L, Zahid M, Bauer K, Brody D, Finkelstein SD, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate DNA analysis to differentiate malignant and benign pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101 : 2493-2500.
  • 6Camp ER, Vogel SB. Blind Whipple resections for periampullary and pancreatic lesions. Am Surg 2004; 70: 6-12.
  • 7Kennedy T, Preczewski L, Stocker S J, Rao SM, Parsons WG,Wayne JD, et al. Incidence of benign inflammatory disease in patients undergoing Whipple procedure for clinically suspected carcinoma: a single-institution experience. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 437-441.
  • 8Tessler DA, Catanzaro A, Velanovich V, Havstad S, Goel S. Predictors of cancer in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy without a tissue diagnosis. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 191-197.
  • 9Sasson AR, Gulizia JM, Galva A, Anderson J, Thompson J. pancreaticoduodenectomy for suspected malignancy: have advancements in radiographic imaging improved results'? Am J Surg 2006; 192: 888-893.
  • 10Abraham SC, Wilentz RE, Yeo C J, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Boitnott JK, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resections) in patients without malignancy: are they all 'chronic pancreatitis'? Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:110-120.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部