期刊文献+

Pure alumina bearings with cementless stems versus sandwich bearings with cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty 被引量:1

Pure alumina bearings with cementless stems versus sandwich bearings with cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Ceramic bearing surfaces have been introduced to prevent osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty (THA),but little is known about the difference in clinical and radiological results between pure alumina and sandwich alumina bearings.The purpose of this study was to analyze the results obtained with third-generation alumina-on-alumina THA with two different designs both in liner and femoral stem fixation after a minimum follow-up of 4.2 years.Methods The results of 195 primary alumina-on-alumina THAs in 167 patients were evaluated.The procedures were performed between January 1998 and October 2006.Three patients died and 11 patients were lost to follow-up,leaving a total of 153 patients (181 hips) available for study.In the 88 group A patients,107 hips were implanted using pure alumina bearings with cementless femoral stems.These patients were followed for (6.84±1.49) years.In the 65 group B patients,74 hips were implanted using sandwich alumina ceramic bearings with cemented femoral stems.These patients had a follow-up period of (7.73±1.60) years.Patients in both groups were evaluated clinically and radiographically.Results One ceramic liner fracture occurred in group A and five took place in group B (P 〈0.05),four of them revised for liner fracture.In each group,one acetabular shell migration happened without liner breakage and two hips developed deep infections,and all these six hips received revisions.Nine femoral components loosened in group B,with seven undergoing revisions.Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 5 years for revision of any component for any reason in group A was 96.26% compared to 90.54% in group B (P 〈0.05).Better function was determined in group A (average Harris hip scores:92.13±2.85) than in group B (average Harris hip scores:86.03±4.21) and the difference was significant (P 〈0.05).Squeaking was not recorded in either group.Conclusions The sandwich design of the acetabular bearings can not reduce the migration rate in ceramic bearings but increase the liner fracture rate compared to pure ceramic liners.The high loosening rate in fluted and taped designed cemented stems with sandwich liners warrant caution to their use. Background Ceramic bearing surfaces have been introduced to prevent osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty (THA),but little is known about the difference in clinical and radiological results between pure alumina and sandwich alumina bearings.The purpose of this study was to analyze the results obtained with third-generation alumina-on-alumina THA with two different designs both in liner and femoral stem fixation after a minimum follow-up of 4.2 years.Methods The results of 195 primary alumina-on-alumina THAs in 167 patients were evaluated.The procedures were performed between January 1998 and October 2006.Three patients died and 11 patients were lost to follow-up,leaving a total of 153 patients (181 hips) available for study.In the 88 group A patients,107 hips were implanted using pure alumina bearings with cementless femoral stems.These patients were followed for (6.84±1.49) years.In the 65 group B patients,74 hips were implanted using sandwich alumina ceramic bearings with cemented femoral stems.These patients had a follow-up period of (7.73±1.60) years.Patients in both groups were evaluated clinically and radiographically.Results One ceramic liner fracture occurred in group A and five took place in group B (P 〈0.05),four of them revised for liner fracture.In each group,one acetabular shell migration happened without liner breakage and two hips developed deep infections,and all these six hips received revisions.Nine femoral components loosened in group B,with seven undergoing revisions.Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 5 years for revision of any component for any reason in group A was 96.26% compared to 90.54% in group B (P 〈0.05).Better function was determined in group A (average Harris hip scores:92.13±2.85) than in group B (average Harris hip scores:86.03±4.21) and the difference was significant (P 〈0.05).Squeaking was not recorded in either group.Conclusions The sandwich design of the acetabular bearings can not reduce the migration rate in ceramic bearings but increase the liner fracture rate compared to pure ceramic liners.The high loosening rate in fluted and taped designed cemented stems with sandwich liners warrant caution to their use.
机构地区 Zhejiang Univ
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第2期244-248,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 CERAMIC-ON-CERAMIC total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces ceramic fracture ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces ceramic fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Fritsch EW, Gleitz M. Ceramic femoral head fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 328: 129-136.
  • 2Sedel L. Evolution of alumina-on-alumina implants: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 379: 48-54.
  • 3Tateiwa T, Clarke IC, Williams PA, Garino J, Manaka M, Shishido T, et al. Ceramic total hip arthroplasty in the United States: safety and risk issues revisited. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)2008; 37: 26-31.
  • 4Inzerillo VC, Garino JE Alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 2003; 12:106-111.
  • 5Savarino L, Baldini N, Ciapetti G, Pellacani A, Giunti A. Is wear debris responsible for failure in alumina-on-alumina implants? Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 162-167.
  • 6Zhou ZK, Li MC B6rlin N, Wood D J, Nivbrant B. No increased migration in cups with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing: an RSA study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 39-45.
  • 7Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M. Two to 9-year clinical results of alumina ceramic on ceramic THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 97-102.
  • 8Park YS, Hwang SK, Choy WS, Kim YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina on alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 780-787.
  • 9Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y. Thespatial location of impingment in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 305-313.
  • 10Ueno M, Amino H, Okimatu H, Oonishi H. Wear, friction, and mechanical investigation and development of alumina-to-alumina combination total hip joint. In: Imura S, eds. Joint arthroplasty. Springer-Verlag: Tokyo, Japan; 1999: 119-131.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部