期刊文献+

质疑“撤村并居” 被引量:4

Questioning on "Withdrawing Villages and Combining Residences"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 撤村并居近年来已在全国许多省市实行。但其政策依据"增减挂钩办法"与《土地管理法》等上位法相矛盾,其合法性值得质疑;撤村并居及"增减挂钩办法"类似于国外的土地发展权制度,但却很不完善,其妥当性值得质疑;撤村并居的实施效果存在外部性,效果并不理想;撤村并居不能解决中国的用地矛盾,应构建完备的土地发展权制度并完善相关配套制度。 In recent years "withdrawing villages and combining residences" in many provinces and cities have been implemented in the country. However its legitimacy is questionable because its policy "means of increasing and decreasing" has contradictions with "Land Management Law" and other upper laws; and its appropriateness is questionable because it is not similar to the system of land development rights abroad and it is imperfect; and the results of its implementation effectiveness with externality are unsatisfactory; which can not solve China's land problem. We should build a comprehensive system of land development right and improve the supporting systems.
作者 任中秀
出处 《云南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第1期5-8,共4页 Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Social Science)
基金 山西省社科联2011~2012年度重点课程研究项目(ssklzdkt2011065)
关键词 撤村并居 宅基地使用权 土地发展权 withdrawing villages and combining residences land use right land development rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

共引文献88

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部