中美书证证据能力规则之比较

Comparing the Credibility of Documentary Evidence between China and the U.S.

我国证据法应借鉴美国《联邦证据规则》,从下述五个方面完善现有的书证证据能力规则:以鉴真规则和传闻证据规则替代抽象的辨别真伪规则,从而分别保证书证的"形式真实"和内容真实;从概念、整体思路、可操作性三个角度完善我国的原始文书规则;赋予对方异议权以增强我国摘录完整性规则的可操作性;应引进摘要采纳规则,以适应数量巨大书证出示调查的需要;采取广义的书证界定,取消视听资料和电子证据这两种法定证据种类,正视转化书证、综合性书证的存在并对其实行多重审查。

Our Evidence Law should draw experience from the U. S. The Federal Rules of Evidence, and improve current rules of documentary evidence from five aspects： replacing abstract identification rule with authentication and with hearsay evidence to ensure me venty hal text rule from concept, overall thinking and maneuverability; granting opposite with right to appeal so as to enhance the operability of excerpt integrity rule ; introducing adoption rule of abstract to meet a large amount of documentary evidence investigation; adopting wide definition of documentary evidence and abandoning the classification of two legal evidences, video document and electronic evidence, and correctly understanding the existence of documentary evidence and comprehensive documentary evidence which ought be conducted by multiple review.