期刊文献+

投资条约仲裁对“国际商事仲裁”之借鉴与改革 被引量:1

The Implications of International Treaty Arbitration for International Commercial Arbitration and the Reform of International Treaty Arbitration
原文传递
导出
摘要 投资条约仲裁是以国际商事仲裁为模板建立的,其不仅在具体规则中体现了"国际商事仲裁"的基本特性,同时其实践中无不体现"国际商事仲裁"的价值取向。投资条约仲裁在争端主体、争议事项、仲裁庭管辖权之基础等多方面存在特殊性。为避免投资条约仲裁与国际商事仲裁"秘密性"等原则相冲突,一些国际组织和国家开始了改革投资条约仲裁的努力,这些努力可以视为对国际商事仲裁的发展起来。 Investment treaty arbitration has been established based on international commercial arbitration, reflecting not only the basic features of international commercial arbitration in provisions, but also the value orientation of international commercial arbitration in practice. Investment treaty arbitration differs from international commercial arbitration inparticipants in a dispute, dispute issues and the basis of the jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal. In order to avoid the conflict between investment treaty arbitration and international commercial arbitration, some international organizations and countries begin the efforts to reform investment treaty arbitration, which could be regarded as the development of international commercial arbitration.
作者 袁杜娟
机构地区 上海大学法学院
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期53-60,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
关键词 投资条约仲裁 国际商事仲裁 改革 investment treaty arbitration international commercial arbitration reform
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献92

  • 1Susan D. Frank, The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law ThroughInconsistent Decisions, 73 Fordham L. Rev. , 2005.
  • 2SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance S. A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13(2003), para. 168--170.
  • 3SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance S. A. v. Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6(Jan. 29, 2004), para.128.
  • 4S. D. Myers, Inc, v. Canada, Award UNCITRAL(2000), pp. 258--262.
  • 5Metalcald Corp. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/1(2000), para. 99.
  • 6Todd Weiler, NAFTA Investment Arbitration and the Growth of International Economic Law, 36 Can. Bus. L. J. , 2002.
  • 7Kelley Connolly, Say What You Mean: Improved Drafting Resources as a Means for Increasing the Consistency of Interpretation of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 40 vand. J. Transnat'l L. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 40, 2007.
  • 8Dinah Shelton, Reconcilable Difference? The Interpretation of Multilingual Treaties, 20 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. , 1997.
  • 9Ana M. Lopez--Rodriguez, Towards a European Civil Code without a Common European Legal Culture? The Link between Law,Language and Culture, 29 Brook. J. Int'l L., 2004.
  • 10Valerie H. Ruttenberg, Comment, The United States Bilateral Investment Treaty Program: Variations on the Model, 9 U. Pa.J. Int'l Bus. L., 1987.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部