公司创业模型回顾与比较被引量：13

导出

摘要随着公司创业如火如荼地开展,研究公司创业模型,探究公司创业的影响因素以及不同因素之间的作用机理,对于指导公司创业具有越来越重要的理论及实践意义。本文首先对现有影响较大的公司创业模型进行了介绍和分析,并从团队、资源、机会和环境四个方面对这些模型进行了比较,归纳总结了公司创业模型的特点、各模型之间的传承关系以及对我国公司创业研究的启示,最后展望了公司创业模型研究的未来发展方向。

作者董保宝

机构地区吉林大学管理学院吉林大学创业研究中心

出处《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期1-9,26,共10页 Foreign Economics & Management

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目<基于资源观的新企业创建及早期成长机理研究>(编号:70732005) 国家自然科学基金面上项目<基于中国情境的服务型小企业创业机理研究>(编号:71072020) 吉林大学基本科研业务费项目<创业网络动态能力对新创企业竞争优势的影响机理研究>(编号:2010JC031) 吉林大学"985工程"和"211工程"资助项目

关键词创业公司创业创业模型要素均衡要素主导

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J ]. Journal of Management, 1991,17 ( 1 ) : 99 - 120.
2Barney J. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage:A ten year retrospective on the resource-based view[J]. Journal of Management, 2001,27 (1) : 643- 650.
3Bird B J. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1988,13(3) : 442-454.
4Busenitz L W, et al. Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions[J]. Journal of Management, 2003,29(3) :285-308.
5Casson M. Entrepraneurship and the theory of the firm[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior b- Organization, 2005,59 (2) : 327- 348.
6Dess G, et al. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship [J] Journal of Management,2003,29(3) :351-378.
7Foss N J, et al. Entrepreneurship, subjeetivism, and the re- source-based view:Toward a new synthesis[J]. Strategic En- trepreneurship Journal, 2008,2 (1) : 73- 94.
8Grebel T, et al. An evolutionary approach to the theory of entre- preneurship[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2003,10 (4) : 493- 514.
9Guth W and Ginsberg A. Corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Stra- tegic Management Journal, 1990,11 (1) : 5- 15.
10Hornsby J, et al. An interactive model of the corporate entre- preneurship process[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Prae tice, 1993,17(2) :29 37.

二级参考文献24

1林嵩,张帏,姜彦福.创业成长模型评述及构建思路探讨[J].科研管理,2007,28(1):84-88. 被引量：12
2高建,程源,李习保.全球创业观察中国报告--基于2005年数据的分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
3McDougall, P P, and Oviatt, B M. New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: A follow-up study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1996, 11(1): 23-40.
4Zahra, S A, Ireland, D R, and Hitt, M A. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(5): 925-950.
5Zahra, S, Matherne, B, and Carelton, J. Leveraging technological resources for competitive advantage: The case of software new ventures[R]. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual McGill University Conference on Globalization, in press, 2000.
6Zahra, S, and Garvis, S. International corporate entrepreneurship and company performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000,15 : 469- 492.
7Autio, E, Sapienza, H J, and Almeida, J G. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(5): 909-924.
8Oviatt, B M, and McDougall, P P. A framework for understanding accelerated international entrepreneurship[J]. Research in Global Strategic Management, 1999,7 :158- 169.
9Terpstra, D E, and Olson, P D. Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: A classification of problems[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1993,6:21-32.
10Boeker, W. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry[J]. Adm Sci. Q ,1997,42: 213-236.