1Wiegand UK, Potratz J, Luninghake F, et al. Electmphysiological characteristics of bi- polar membrane carbon leads with and with- out steroid elution compared with a conven- tional carbon and a steroid - during platinum lead. PACE, 1996,19(8) :1155.
2Kay GN, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ, et al. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar active fix- ation atrial pacing leads. PACE, 1988, 11 (5) :544 -9.
3Comaechia D, Fabbri M, Puglisi A, et al. Latest generation of unipolar and bipolar ster- oid eluting leads: long - term comparison of electrical performance in atrium and ventri- cles. Europace, 2000,2(3) :240.
4Schuchert A, Meinertz T. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrbythmic drug on the ventricu- lar evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Cardiology, 2000, 94 : 103 - 105.
5Breivik K, Ohm OJ, Engedal H, et al. Long - term comparison of unipolar and bipolar pacing and sensing, using a new multipro- grammable pacemaker system. PACE, 1983,6(3 Pt 1) :592.
7Nielsen AP, Cashion Wit, Spencer WH, et ul. Long - term assessment of unipolar and bipolar stimulation and sensing thresholds u- sing a lead configuration programmable pace- maker. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 , 5 (5) :1198.
9Romanb M, Spinelli A, Grieco A. Spontane- ous daily variability d atrial sensitivity. A study with an implanted DDD pacemaker. Int J Cardiol, 2001,77(2 -3) :28.
10Lewalter T, Schimpf R, Kulik D, et al. Comparison of spontaneous atrial fibrillation electrogram potentials with the P - wave elec- trogram amplitude in dual chamber pacing with unipolar atrial sensing. Europace, 2000,2(2) :136.
4Levine PA, Barolds CP, Fletcher RD, et al. Adverse acute and chronic effect of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing systems. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983, 1: 1413.
5Gould L, Patel S, Gnoes Gl, et al. Pacemaker failure following external defibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 1981, 4: 575.
6Dahl CF, Ewy GA, Warner ED, et al. Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock: effect of paddle electrode size and time interval between discharges. Circulation, 1974, 50:956.
7Altramurd G, Biancom L, Lo Bianco F, et al. Transthoracic DC shcok may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 1995, 18: 194.
8Waller C, Callies F, Langenfeld H. Adverse effeets of direct current cardioversion on cardiac pacemakers and electodes, Is external cardioversion contraindicated in patients with permanent pecing systems.Europace, 2004, 6: 165.
9Giedwoyn JO. Pacemaker failure following external defibrillation.Circulation, 1971, 44: 293.
10Das G, Eaton J. Pacemaker malfuntion following transthoracic countershock. Pacing. Clin Eleetrophysiol, 1981, 4: 487.
