摘要
范式的不可通约性是由库恩提出的,费耶阿本德则把库恩的观点推向极端,这使他们走向科学的相对主义与文化的相对主义。正是这种相对主义,使他们成为反科学主义、后现代主义的先驱,而费耶阿本德本人就是一个反科学主义者。范式的不可通约性包含着合理的因素,但其错误在于:没有辩证地处理范式的可通约性和不可通约性的关系;没有正确理解理论各个部分的关系。后一错误又表现在两个方面,没有弄清理论的来源,颠倒了理论的"真"的方向。
Non-commensurability of paradigm was raised by Kuhn and Feyerabend pushed the view of Kuhn to extreme, which made them move towards the relativism of science and culture. Because of the review of relativism, they became the pioneer of counter-science and latter modernism. Feyerabend was a counter-scientific person himself. It contains rational factors, but the problem lies in not dealing with the relationship between commensurability and non-commensurability of paradigm dialectically and not understanding the relation of each part of theory correctly. The second mistake is that it does not make clear the source of theory and reverts the true direction of theory.
出处
《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2012年第1期1-5,32,共6页
Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目(10BZX006)