摘要
体育竞技伤害行为是体育竞技活动中最常见和多发的冲突类型。由于体育竞技领域素来有"行业自治"的传统,因此对该领域的法律介入,特别是刑事法律的介入存在很大的现实困境。因此对体育竞技伤害行为性质的认定,对于刑法介入具有十分重大的现实意义。本文认为,体育竞技伤害犯罪可以包括故意型和过失型,具有与普通伤害罪相比较为显著的特征。对于造成一定危害结果但不具有社会危害性和违法性的伤害行为,根据正当化行为理论不构成犯罪。
Sports injury is the most common types of conflict in competitive sports activities. Since the sports field has always advocated the tradition of "autonomy", it is hard for law, especially criminal law to play a role there in reality. So the judgment of the nature of injury behavior in competitive sports should be of great practical significance for the introduction of criminal law to this field. This paper maintains that sports-crime injuries can include intentional and negligent injuries, with more prominent features compared with ordinary crimes. Causing certain harmful result but not with social dangers and illegality of victimization, according to the theory of justification behavior, does not constitute a crime.
出处
《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期115-120,共6页
Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
体育竞技伤害
竞技伤害犯罪
被害人承诺
competitive sports injury
athletic injury crime
victim's promise