期刊文献+

激光粒度仪与沉降一吸管法测定褐土颗粒组成的比较 被引量:12

Comparison of Determination on Grain Size of Cinnamon Soil by Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer and Pipette Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 土壤颗粒组成是土壤的基本物理属性之一,沉降—吸管法是传统土壤颗粒分析的主要方法,激光粒度仪法是近年来新兴的粒度分析方法。为了研究二者的差异,选取了23个黏粒含量差异较大的褐土样品,采用上述两种方法对土样进行了分析。结果表明:激光粒度仪检测<0.002mm颗粒含量低于吸管法,但二者有较好的相关性,决定系数为0.97;在检测<0.02mm颗粒含量时两者比较接近,并且相关性很好,决定系数为0.99;检测<0.05mm颗粒含量时两者也比较接近,决定系数为0.91。激光粒度仪检测结果通过转换模型修正后,可以较好地反映褐土土壤颗粒组成情况。 The particle-size composition is a basic soil physical property.Pipette method is a main traditional approch to analyze the soil particle-size composition while laser diffraction particle size analyzer is a new particle-size analysis instrument in recent years.The paper took 23 cinnamon soil samples with various clay particle contents to study the discrepancy between the two methods mentioned above.It shows that the results from laser diffraction particle size analyzer method are lower than pipette method when measuring the particle-size 0.002 mm while they have a good correlation with a determination coefficient of 0.97;when it comes to0.02 mm particle-size,the results come close and have a strong correlation with a determination coefficient of 0.99;when measuring particle content0.05 mm,they come very close with a determination coefficient of 0.91.The results from laser diffraction particle size analyzer can reflect the soil particle-size composition well if they get revised by a transformational model.
作者 刘涛 高晓飞
出处 《水土保持研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期16-18,22,共4页 Research of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室开放课题(2008-ZY-01)
关键词 土壤颗粒分析 吸管法 激光粒度仪法 转换模型 soil particle-size analysis pipette method laser diffraction particle size analyzer transformational model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献66

  • 1胡雪峰,鹿化煜.黄土高原古土壤成土过程的特异性及发生学意义[J].土壤学报,2004,41(5):669-675. 被引量:23
  • 2王君波,朱立平.不同前处理对湖泊沉积物粒度测量结果的影响[J].湖泊科学,2005,17(1):17-23. 被引量:49
  • 3赵景波.关中平原420-350kaBP的古土壤与环境[J].地理学报,2005,60(1):32-40. 被引量:10
  • 4Gee G W, Bauder J W. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A. ed. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Ed. Agronomy, 9. Madison, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 1986. 383 - 411.
  • 5Westerhof R, Buurman P, Gfiethuysen C, et al. Aggregation studied by laser diffraction in relation to plowing and liming in the Cerrado region in Brazil. Geoderma, 1999, 90:277 - 290.
  • 6MeCave I N, Bryant R S, Cook H F, et al. Evaluation of a laser diffraction size analyzer for use with natural sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1986, 56 : 561 - 564.
  • 7Loizeau J L, Arbouille D, Santiago S, et al. Evaluation of a wide range laser diffraction grain analysizer for use with sediments. Sedimentology, 1994, 41 : 353 -361.
  • 8Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 9th Ed. Washington D. C. : United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, 324.
  • 9孙波,施建平,杨林章主编.陆地生态系统土壤观测规范.中国环境科学出版社,2007.215-218.
  • 10Eshel G, Levy G J, Mingelgrin U, et al. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. , 2004, 68:736 -743.

共引文献151

同被引文献156

引证文献12

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部