环境侵权中侵害排除之法理

The Jurisprudence of Injunction in Environmental Tort

在环境侵权中,侵害排除是比起损害赔偿更为重要的救济方式。我国学界对于侵害排除应当纳入绝对权请求权还是作为侵权责任的一种形式以及《民法通则》第一百三十四条与《环境保护法》第四十一条之间的异同存在争议。但是本文认为,环境侵权中侵害排除之法理的研究应该将重点放在其法理根据以及要件(判断框架)的研究上。为此,可以借鉴日本的学说,将侵害法益分为生命健康等核心权利和除此之外的利益,并根据法益的不同而分别设定不同的判断框架。

In environmental tort,injunction is more important than damages.The jurisprudence debate in China focuses on the following two problems： whether injunction should be included in the absolute right claim or as a form of tort liability,and whether there is difference between article 134 of the ＂General Principles of the Civil Law＂ and article 41 of the ＂Environmental Protection Law＂.However,this paper maintains that the jurisprudence of injunction should focus on its legal basis and the elements（the framework of determine）.Therefore,this paper will draw on Japan＇s experience,and divide the legal interests of injunction into core rights and other interests,and formulate different frameworks of jurisdiction according to the difference in legal interests.