重塑行政审判的价值追求与目标设定——以行政纠纷的实质性解决为中心

Remolding the Value Orientation and Goal Setting of Administrative Adjudgment——A Study Centering on the Substantial Resolution of Administrative Disputes

我国现行的行政审判制度不能实质性解决行政纠纷使其正当性受到质疑,解决行政纠纷既是行政审判制度的应有之义,也是现阶段行政审判必须担负起的政治功能。现行行政审判制度的价值追求与目标设定未能回应实质性解决行政纠纷的需求,其根源在于"双重社会"下法治理想与社会现实的矛盾。行政审判制度价值追求与目标设定应具有"中国性",必须对当下行政纠纷实质性解决的现实需要予以回应,并发挥多元化纠纷解决机制的配合协调作用。

At present,China＇s administrative adjudgement system fails to resolve administrative disputes substantially,which has left people doubting its justifiability.Properly resolving administrative disputes is not only an integral duty of administrative adjudgement system,but also a political function that administrative adjedgement at the moment must undertake.The fact that the value orientation and goal setting of the present administrative adjudgement system fail to respond to the needs of substantially resolving administrative disputes is,essentially,due to the contradiction between the ideal of rule of law and social reality under the restrictions of the current ＂dual society＂.In a word,the value orientation and goal setting of the administrative adjudgement system should carry Chinese characteristics,respond swiftly to the call for substantial resolution of administrative disputes,and give full play to the coordinated and cooperative role of the pluralistic dispute-resolving mechanism.