期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因等比重腰麻在剖宫产手术中的效果比较 被引量:15

Effect comparison on the different concentrations of isobaric Ropivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同浓度罗哌卡因等比重腰麻在剖宫产术中的麻醉效果。方法将180例行剖宫产手术孕妇随机分为A组、B组及C组,每组各60例,分别给予0.75%、0.50%和0.30%的等比重罗哌卡因进行腰麻,比较三组在剖宫产术中的麻醉效果、感觉运动阻滞情况及不良反应发生率。结果 A组、B组及C组麻醉优良率分别为91.7%、90.0%和56.7%,A、B组显著优于C组(P<0.01),但A、B组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组及B组感觉运动阻滞起效时间、痛觉阻滞时间显著优于C组(P<0.05),A组及B组无显著差别(P>0.05);三组感觉阻滞平面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组、B组及C组不良反应发生率分别为16.6%、15.0%和13.4%,三组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论0.5%罗哌卡因等比重腰麻可满足剖宫产手术的要求,具有麻醉起效时间快、不良反应少的特点。 Objective To compare the effect of different concentrations of isobaric Ropivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section.Methods 180 cases scheduled for cesarean section were randomly divided into group A(0.75% Ropivacaine),group B(0.50% Ropivacaine) and group C(0.30% Ropivacaine),with 60 cases each in group.Anesthetic effect,motor block,sensory block and incidence of adverse reactions were compared among three groups.Results Excellent and good rate were 91.7%,90.0% and 56.7% in group A,group B and group C,of which much higher in group A and group B than group C(P〉 0.01),but there was no significant difference between group A and group B(P 〈0.05);the onset time of motor and sensory block and the duration of sensory in group A and group B were shorter than that of group C(P 〈0.05),and there was no significant difference between group A and group B(P 〉0.05);there were no significantly difference of incidence of adverse reactions among three groups(16.6% vs 15.0% vs 13.4%)(P〉 0.05).Conclusion 0.5% isobaric Ropivacaine meets the needs of cesarean section because of faster anesthetic effect time and less adverse reactions.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2012年第6期82-83,共2页 China Medical Herald
关键词 剖宫产 罗哌卡因 腰麻 Cesarean section Ropivacaine Lumbar anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献41

  • 1孙志华,郭曲练,邹望远.间断鞘内注射不同浓度罗哌卡因对大鼠脊髓及神经根早期超微结构的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(4):283-287. 被引量:50
  • 2李景辉.罗哌卡因与布比卡因用于剖宫产腰麻的效果比较[J].海南医学院学报,2007,13(1):50-50. 被引量:4
  • 3Markham A, Faulds D. Ropivaeaine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs, 1996,52:429-449.
  • 4Van Kleef JW, Veering BT, Burm AG. Spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine: a double-blind study on the efficacy and safety of 0.5% and 0.75% solutions in patients undergoing minor lower limb surgery. Anesth Analg, 1994,78 : 1125-1130.
  • 5Kristensen JD, Karlsten R, Gordh T. Spinal cord blood flow after intrathecal injection of ropivacaine and bupivacaine with or without epinephrine in rats. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1998,42: 685-690.
  • 6Kristensen JD, Karlsten R, Gordh T. Spinal cord blood flow after intrathecal injection of ropivacaine: a screening for neurotoxic effects. Anesth Analg, 1996,82 : 636-640.
  • 7McNamee DA, McClelland AM, Scott S, et al. Spinal anaesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine 5 mg/ml with bupivacaine 5 mg/ml for major orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2002,89 : 702-706.
  • 8McNamee DA, Parks L, McClelland AM, et al. lntrathecal ropivacaine for total hip arthroplasty: double-blind comparative study with isobaric 7.5 mg/ml and 10 mg/ml solutions. Br J Anaesth, 2001, 87: 743-747.
  • 9Malinovsky JM, Charles F, Kick O, et al. Intrathecal anesthesia: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine. Anesth Analg, 2000, 91: 1457-1460.
  • 10Ronald D.Miller.主编,曾因明,邓小明,主译.米勒麻醉学[M].第6版.北京:北京大学出版社,2006,473-474.

共引文献42

同被引文献76

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部