摘要
以《侵权责任法》实施以来20份医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件二审判决书为基础,讨论鉴定与判决的关系。这些判决虽明示或默示采信鉴定报告,但判决结果与鉴定结论并不一一对应,显示出案件审理中司法判断力膨胀的特点。必须彻底抛弃医疗事故鉴定体制、从严掌握多次鉴定申请,建立起合理的鉴定结论采信规则,增强判决的可预见性。
The article discusses the relation of identifications and judgments according to 20 cases for medical malpractice after the implement of Tort Liability Act. Verdicts accept the Identification reports explicitly or implicitly, but the judgments don't correspond with the identification report well. It means the expansion of judicial discretion. It should abandon the medical accident identification system completely, control the identification number strictly, and establish reasonable rules for adoption of the identification conclusion in order to enhance the predictability of judgments.
出处
《医学与哲学(A)》
北大核心
2012年第2期55-57,79,共4页
Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
关键词
医疗损害责任纠纷
医疗损害鉴定
侵权责任法
dispute on liability for medical malpractice, identification of medical malpractice, Tort Liability Act