期刊文献+

Mind the Gap:Predicted vs.Actual Performance of Green Buildings

Mind the Gap:Predicted vs.Actual Performance of Green Buildings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper reviews the major North American and Australian sustainability rating tools to determine how they measure building energy performance.It then reviews the major building energy simulation software packages.The paper then details some of the literature surrounding predicted vs.actual energy performance in green buildings,and concludes with an argument for a more performance-orientated ratings regime. This paper reviews the major North American and Australian sustainability rating tools to determine how they measure building energy performance.It then reviews the major building energy simulation software packages.The paper then details some of the literature surrounding predicted vs.actual energy performance in green buildings,and concludes with an argument for a more performance-orientated ratings regime.
作者 Brett Pollard
出处 《施工技术》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第2期1-8,21,共9页 Construction Technology
关键词 green BUILDINGS RATING TOOLS building energy PERFORMANCE green buildings rating tools building energy performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Bannister P. XR-CR-71-Australian Building Codes Board - Class 5 Benchmarking, Australian Building Codes Board [ S/OL ]. http://www, abcb. gov. au/index, cfm? objectid = D8CB8D20- DFCA-11 DE-B1 DDO01143 D4D594,2004.
  • 2Bannister P. Why good buildings go bad while some are just born that way[ J/OL]. Exergy Australia P/L, 2006.
  • 3Barrientos J, et. al. Green buildings in Massachusetts: Comparison between actual and predicted energy performance,' Proceedings Annual Meeting American Solar Energy Society[ C ]. 2007.
  • 4CaGBC, LEED Canada for New Construction and Major Renovations ( Version 2009 ) [ R ]. Canada Green Building Council, 2009.
  • 5CaGBC, Average scorecard for LEED Canada NC 1.0 - LEED Canada for new construction (NC) credit distribution as of June 2010[ S/OL]. Canada Green Building Council, http://www. cagbc, org/leed/systems/new construction/documents. php. 2010.
  • 6Crawley DB, Hnad JW, Kummert M , et al. Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performanee simulation programs [ C/OL]. Building and Environment, Ninth Intemational IBPSA Conference, Montreal Canada: http://gundog, lbl. gov/dirpubs/ BS05/ BS05_0231. pdf.
  • 7Department of environment, climate change and water, NSW (DECCW), NABERS - Frequently asked questions, DECCW [M/OL]. http://www, nabers, com. au/faqs, aspx? site = 1 # 51. 2010.
  • 8Diamond R, Opitz M, Hicks T, et al. Evaluating the energy performance of the first generation of LEED certified commercial buildings[R/OL] US Green Building Council. http://epb, lbl. gov/homepages/ Rick_Diamond/LBNL59853-LEED. pdf. 2006.
  • 9EcoSmart Foundation 2006, Building performance evaluation (BPE) project, EcoSmart Foundation, Vancouver, Canada, studies and evaluation [ R/OL]. http://www, ecosmart, ca/ index, cfm? bd = kbdet, cfm&id =58.
  • 10Environment Protection Agency (EPA). Celebrating a decade of energy star buildings 1999-2009, EPA [R/OL]. http://www. energystar, gov/index, cfm? c = business, bus_ES_bldgs. 2009.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部