期刊文献+

虚拟社区对消费者购买行为的影响——一个参照群体视角 被引量:21

The Influence of Virtual Community on Consumer Buying Behavior:From a Reference Group Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以参照群体理论为基础,针对信息性动机、群体规范、社区认同感、虚拟社区意识对消费者行为的影响提出了若干假设,构建了消费者参与虚拟社区的购买行为变化理论模型,运用结构方程模型方法进行了实证检验。结果表明,虚拟社区是对消费者具有明显影响力的参照群体,虚拟社区对消费者的购买行为产生信息性影响和规范性影响,使消费者的购买行为发生变化。消费者对信息的需求越强烈,对虚拟社区的认同感越强,受虚拟社区的信息性影响越大。社区意识在社区认同感、群体规范与虚拟社区的规范性影响之间起着完全中介作用。消费者的社区意识越强烈,受虚拟社区的规范性影响越大。 Based on referral group theory, this paper proposes some theoretical hypotheses that virtual community affects consumer's buying behavior. It builds up buying behavior variation model of consumer's participation in virtual community. By validating this study model with the method of Structural Equation Model, result shows that virtual community is a kind of referral group that has distinct influence on its members. The influence lies in two aspects: informative influence and normative influence. Informative influence and normative influence produced by virtual community will change consumers' buying intention and behavior. Hereinto, the more consumers' needs for information, the stronger their sense of community identity. Sense of virtual community serves as a full mediator between group norm or sense of community identity and normative influence of virtual community. The stronger their sense of virtual community, the stronger the normative influence of virtual community on them.
作者 徐小龙
出处 《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期114-123,共10页 Finance & Trade Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(编号:10YJC630306)的资助
关键词 虚拟社区 消费者 购买行为 参照群体 Virtual Community, Consumer, Buying Behavior, Referral Group
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献130

  • 1周志民.基于品牌社群的消费价值研究[J].中国工业经济,2005(2):103-109. 被引量:79
  • 2陈劲,高金玉.复杂产品系统创新的模糊前端影响因素分析[J].管理学报,2005,2(3):281-290. 被引量:23
  • 3周志民.品牌社群形成机理模型初探[J].商业经济与管理,2005(11):74-79. 被引量:48
  • 4[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 5[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 6[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 7[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 8[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 9[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 10[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162

共引文献9320

同被引文献260

引证文献21

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部