期刊文献+

能力共享可降低服务运作系统的应急成本么?——基于两种能力支援的应急决策模型研究 被引量:6

Can Disruption Cost be Greatly Cut Down Via Capacity-Sharing? A Model Research Based on Two Kinds of Capacity Trading Mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 与伙伴企业进行能力共享被很多管理者视为波动运营环境下增强系统的运作柔性和降低运营成本的有效措施之一,但一些大型的服务运作系统,如电力、通信等核心能力在突发事件后损毁的情况下,能力共享是否也可降低应急期间的运作成本?为验证该观点,本文对2006年中国电信海底光缆震断后的应急实践进行了抽象,并研究了能力共享伙伴向受损系统进行正常和快速两种能力支援情景下的多阶段应急决策问题,通过建模和数值分析后发现:能力共享对降低大型服务运作系统的应急成本极为有限、成本的降低极大程度上依赖于自身能力恢复的速度等4个有益应急管理的结论。 Sharing capacity with partners is considered as one of the most effective measures to improve the operational flexibility and performance of the operation system in a violate environment. However, whether capacity-sharing could really lower the operational cost when some large-scaled service operation system, such as power-grid or telecommunication system's critical capacity is crippled by some unexpected events? To probe the question, we re-investigate the practice of China Telecom Corporation when its submarine cables are partially damaged by earthquake. After the abstraction, we focus on the scenario that capacity- sharing partners provide two kinds of capacity supports: regular and expedite capacity supports, a multiple period decision model is presented correspondingly. After the numerical analysis, we find an interesting phenomenon that shortening the time of re-putting recovered capacity into use, capacity-sharing contributes rather little to cut down the disruption cost. Beside four important managerial insights are obtained.
作者 包兴
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期123-128,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 教育部人文社科基金资助项目(10YJC630004 09YJC630201 11YJC630159) 教育部高校博士点专项科研基金(20113326120002) 中国博士后科学基金项目(20110491822)
关键词 服务运作系统 能力共享 正常和快速支援 多阶段 service operation system capacity-sharing regular and expedite support multi-period
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Tomlin,B.. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks [J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(5): 639--657.
  • 2Wu,J. , Wang,S. Y. , Chao, X.. Impact of Risk Attirude on Optima1 Decisions in Supply Contract [R] Working paper, Beijing Universtiy of Posts and Telecommunications, 2006.
  • 3于辉,陈剑.需求依赖于价格的供应链应对突发事件[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(3):36-41. 被引量:44
  • 4Tang, C.. Review.. Perspectives in supply chain risk management [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 103:451--488.
  • 5Wu, M. C. , Chang, W. J.. A short-- term capacity trading method for semiconductor labs with partnership [J]. Expert systems with Applications, 2007, 33:476 --483.
  • 6Chopra, S. , Sodhi ,S.. Managing risk to avoid supplychain breakdown[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2004, 46 (1):53--62.
  • 7Minner, S.. Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: A review[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 200:3, 81--82: 265--279.
  • 8Fukuda, Y.. Optimal policies for the inventory problem with negotiable lead time [J]. Management Science, 1964, 10:690--708.
  • 9Zhang, V.L. Ordering policies for an Inventory system with three supply modes[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 1996, 43: 691--708.
  • 10Chiang, C. , Gutierrez, G. A periodic review inventory system with two supply modes[J]. European Journal of Operational Research ,1996, 94: 527--547.

二级参考文献51

共引文献106

同被引文献97

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部