期刊文献+

基于差异驱动的主客体协作式综合评价方法 被引量:12

Collaborative Comprehensive Evaluation Approach Based on Differentiation Principle
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对多属性综合评价问题,提出了一种基于差异驱动的主客体协作式综合评价方法。在主客体协作式综合评价过程中,首先获取被评价对象(评价客体)和外部评价者(评价主体)的属性赋权向量;然后以评价主体和评价客体落在意见一致区间内的成员个数占本群体成员的比例判断该群体应采取怎样的赋权策略,并据此给出评价主体和评价客体的话语权重;根据"差异驱动"原理,综合集成来自主客体的评价信息,得到最终评价结论。最后,用一个应用例检验了方法的有效性。 To solve the problems of comprehensive evaluation, we suggest an approach of collaborative comprehensive evaluation based on differentiation principle. In the process of collaborative comprehensive evaluation, we must get every evaluation agent's judgments firstly. Then we can obtain the numbers of the evaluated objects and the evaluators who are in the consensus interval. So we can judge which weight determining strategies would be selected and get every evaluation agent's weight in the group of their own type afterwards. The conclusion of comprehensive evaluation is got by aggregating the evaluating result of all the objects according to the differentiation principle. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期171-176,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071030) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(N100606002)
关键词 :综合评价 主客体协作 赋权策略 差异驱动 comprehensive evaluation collaboration of evaluated objects and evaluators weight determining strategy~ differentiation principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Xu,Z. S. , Da, Q. L.. An overview of operators for ag- gregating information[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2003,18(9):953--969.
  • 2Mateos,A. , Jimenez,A. , Rios-Insua, S.. Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1842--1864.
  • 3Ye,F. , Li, Y. N.. Group multi-attribute decision model to partner selection in the formation of virtual enterprise under incomplete information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(5): 9350--9357.
  • 4Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2009, 51 (1 -- 2) : 1 -- 12.
  • 5Ben-Arieh, D. , Easton, T.. Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43(3): 713--721.
  • 6Deng,M. R. , Xu,W. X. , Yang, J. B.. Estimating the attribute weights through evidential reasoning and mathematical programming[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2004, 3(3): 419--428.
  • 7廖貅武,李垣,董广茂.一种处理语言评价信息的多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(9):90-98. 被引量:40
  • 8Zhang,D. N. ,Yi, P. T. ,Guo,Y. J.. Self-determination Evaluation method based on condition of weights nondictatorship rate[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20(2): 310--320.
  • 9余雁,梁.基于Nash均衡约束的竞争性评估方法研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(1):8-13. 被引量:17
  • 10易平涛,郭亚军.权数非独裁性条件下基于竞争视野优化的多属性决策方法[J].控制与决策,2007,22(11):1259-1263. 被引量:28

二级参考文献58

共引文献80

同被引文献125

引证文献12

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部