期刊文献+

专利丛林困境及其治理路径 被引量:6

Jungle Dilemma of Patents and the Governance Path
下载PDF
导出
摘要 专利制度是基于保护和激励专利权人的一种制度设计,它赋予了专利权人对所拥有专利的垄断性排他权。当多个专利权人对某专利同时拥有部分专利权,且专利交叉授权难以进行时,破碎的产权之间便会产生相互制约关系。部分专利权人还运用沉睡专利的策略,无形扩大、滥用专利权,这些均造成了"专利丛林困境"。这样,专利的开发或商业化就会被阻隔,专利的闲置和浪费导致了"反公地悲剧"的出现。文章从反公地悲剧理论出发,研究了专利领域存在的丛林困境,认为专利池和强制许可等治理路径,可以作为化解专利丛林困境的有效选择。 As an incentive and a protection for the patentees, the patent system is designed to grant the patentees the exclusive monopoly right. When several patentees have common rights of one particular patent and cross - licensing can not seem to work, the fragmented property rights will constrain each other. Some patentees even take the advantage of sleeping patent strategy to expand and abuse the patent right, which brings about the patent jungle dilemma. As a result, the development or commercialization of the patents will be hampered, and the waste of them will finally lead to the emergence of "the tragedy of the anti - commons" Based on the theory of "the tragedy of the anti - commons", we do researches on thicket dilemma in the field of patent, pointing out that the paths such as patent pool and compulsory licenses can be regarded as effective choices to resolve the dilemma.
作者 陈潭 黄金
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第1期50-56,共7页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 反公地悲剧 专利丛林 沉睡专利 专利池 强制许可 tragedies of the anti -commons patent thicket dilemmas sleeping patents patent pools com- pulsory licenses of patents
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1HARDIN G. The Tragedy of the Commons[J]. Science, 1968,162(3859) :1244.
  • 2MICHELMAN F I. Ethics, Economics, and the Law of Property [ M ] // PENNOCK J R, John W Chapman ( eds. ). Ethics, Economics, and the Law : Nomas ⅩⅩⅣ, 1982:25.
  • 3HELLER M. The Tragedy of the Anticommons :Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets [ J ]. Harvard Law Review, 1998,111 (3).
  • 4SHAPIRO C. Navigating the Patent Thicket:Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting [ M ]. Massachusetts : the MIT Press, 2001 : 119 - 122.
  • 5LEMLEY MARK A, SHAPIRO CARL. Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking[J]. Texas Law Review, 2007,58:993.
  • 6CHRIS HOLMAN. Clearing a Path Through the Patent Thicket[ J]. DOI 10. 1016/j. cell. May 19,2006, pp. 629.
  • 7FRANCESCO PARISI, NORBERT SCHULZ, BEN DEPOORTER. Duality in Property:Commons and Anticommons [ J ]. International Review of Law and Economics, 2005,25 ( 4 ) : 578 - 579.
  • 8PALOMERAS NEUS. Sleeping Patents: Any Reason to Wake Up? [ D]. IESE Research Papersl, IESE Business School. No. 506,2003, pp. 4.
  • 9WEEDS HELEN. Sleeping Patents and Compulsory Licensing: An Options Analysis[D]. Warwick Economics Research Paper. 2000,579 : 1.
  • 10DAVIS. Amy Rachel, Patented Embryonic Stem Cells: The Quintessential "Essential Facility" ? [ J ]. Georgetown Law Journal, 2005 ( 11 ) : 206 - 207.

同被引文献79

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部