期刊文献+

管理创新效力提升机制:组织双元性视角 被引量:47

The effectiveness improving mechanism for the management innovation:From the perspective of organizational ambidexterity
原文传递
导出
摘要 从时间和空间两个维度探讨管理创新中探索性与开发性两种学习方式的共存机理,即双元性问题,得出两个维度均存在两者共存现象:时间分离性双元以两者交替主导为特征,空间分离性双元以两者在同一时间点并存为特征,并以江西移动效率管理模式创新为例阐释和验证了两类双元的合理性和可靠性。在此基础上,进一步探讨双元性的实现机制,即构建能够协调两种对立性学习方式的双元型组织,提出在构建双重结构的基础上创建组织情境和提升高管团队效力的具体策略,旨在进一步深化组织学习视角效力机制提升研究。 The coexisting mechanism of the two major learning styles, i.e. , exploration leaning and exploitation leaning in management innovation process from both time and space dimensions, namely, ambidexterity is attempted to explore. And the result indicates that the phenomenon of ambidexterity exists in both dimensions : time ambidexterity is characterized by alternative existence of the two learning styles, while space ambidexterity means exploration and exploitation might exist simultaneously. The case involving efficiency management in Jiangxi China Mobile has been adopted to explain and examine the rationality and reliability of these two kinds of ambidexterity. Therefore, the establishment of ambidextrous organization by creating organization context and improving effectiveness of top management team based on dual structures would be an essential way for improving management innovation effectiveness, with the aim of deep study on the promotion of effectiveness mechanism based on organization learning.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期1-10,共10页 Science Research Management
基金 "中国企业管理创新的适配理论研究" 国家自然科学基金项目(70872013) 2009.1-2011.12 "PORC框架下的国家自主创新体系国际化理论与政策研究" 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71033002) 2011.1-2014.12 "要素协同提升'视角的中小企业成长网络动力形成与演进研究" 国家自然科学基金项目(70902032) 2010.1-2012.12
关键词 管理创新 探索性学习 开发性学习 双元型组织 management innovation exploration learning exploitation learning ambidextrous organization
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Birkinshaw, J., Hamel Cary, & Mol. Management Innovation[J]. Academy of Management Review 2008, 33(4): 825-845.
  • 2Stata, R. Organizational Learning-The Key to Management Innovation[J]. Sloan Management Review,1989 ,63(1):63-73.
  • 3Hamel G. The why, what and how of management innovation[J]. Harvard Business Review 2006,84 (2): 72-84.
  • 4Guillen M.F. Models of management: work, authority, and organization in a comparative perspective[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1994.
  • 5Birkinshaw, J., & Mol, M. How management innovation happens[J]. Sloan Management Review, 2006,47(4): 81-88.
  • 6Armbruster H., A. Bikfalvi, SKinkel, G. Lay. Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys[J].. Technovation.2008,28(10):644-657.
  • 7Naveh E., Meilich O, Marcus A. The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: an organizational learning approach[J].. Strategic Organization.2006,4(3):275-302.
  • 8Barker, J. The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control[M]. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage, 1999.
  • 9March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science.1991, 2(1):71-87.
  • 10Baum, J. A. C, Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions[J].. Administrative Science Quarterly.2000,45(4):766-801.

二级参考文献85

  • 1董小英,蒋贵凰,刘倩倩.知识管理提升企业创新能力的实证研究[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(z1):956-963. 被引量:26
  • 2任志安.超越知识管理:知识治理理论的概念、框架及应用[J].科研管理,2007,28(1):20-26. 被引量:63
  • 3王健友.知识治理的起源与理论脉络梳理[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(6):19-26. 被引量:26
  • 4He,Z L,and Wong, P K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15:481-494.
  • 5Gibson,C B, and Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47 (2) : 209-226.
  • 6Venkatraman, N, Lee,C H, and Lyer,B. Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector[R]. CIP Working Paper, 2007.
  • 7Ebben, J J, and Johnson, A C. Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26 : 1 249-1 259.
  • 8Kyriakopoulos,K, and Moorman, C. Trade-offs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2004,21:219-240.
  • 9Gupta, A K, Smith, K G, and Shalley, C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):693-706.
  • 10Burgelman, R A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002,47:325-357.

共引文献88

同被引文献854

引证文献47

二级引证文献413

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部