期刊文献+

会计准则国际趋同效果的影响因素及研究框架探讨 被引量:1

A Research on Influential Factors of Outcomes of Accounting Standards International Convergence:A Research Framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 鉴于各国向国际财务报告准则趋同化,本文结合制度变迁理论从会计准则国际趋同效果出发,较为系统地对影响会计准则国际趋同效果的影响因素设计了分析研究框架。本文是在"法与金融"学派及Dyck和Zingales为代表的法律外制度因素治理作用研究的基础之上,剖析该领域研究文献的缺陷。本研究旨在为研究的稳健性提供保障,并为制度变迁过程中其他因素如何与财务会计制度变迁相耦合提供一个研究思路。 View of the countries to the IFRS convergence boom,this paper combines the institution change theory and designs a systematic framework on influential factors of outcomes of accounting standards consequence.This article is based on the "Law and Finance" of LLSV and Dyck and Zingales(2004) which are the representatives of the law governance role and outside law governance role of institutional factors.We points that the current cross-country studies haven't considered the institutional factors outside the law and non-institutional factors are lack of theoretical support.We also find that the current studies are lack of stratification and classification of institutional factors,ignoring the alternative and complementary relationship between institutional factors and non-institutional factors and the definition of effect on the financial reporting system.These issues are important for the study of institution evolution effect.
作者 孙雪娇
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期88-96,共9页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(08JJD630010) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972113)
关键词 会计准则 国际趋同 影响因素 效果 accounting standars international convergence influential factors outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Ball, R., A. Robin and J. S. Wu. Incentives versus standards., properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries[J].Journal of Accounting andEconomics, 2003, 36(1-3):235-270.
  • 2La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. Legal determinants of external fi- nance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52: 1131-1150.
  • 3La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance[J].Journal of Political Economy 106(6) : 1131-1155.
  • 4La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance [J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000, 58(1-2): 3-27.
  • 5La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. Investor protection and corporate valuation[J].Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(3) : 1147-1170.
  • 6La Porta, R. , F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleif- er. What works in securities laws[J]. Journal of Fi- nance, 2006, 61(1): 1-32.
  • 7Demirguc-Kunt, A. and V. Maksimovic. Law, Fi- nance, and Firm Growth[J].Journal of Finance, 1998, 53: 2107-2138.
  • 8Leuz, C. , Dhananjay Nanda, and Peter D. Wysoc- ki. Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison[J]. Journal of Finan-cial Economics, 2003, 69(3): 505-527.
  • 9Defond, M. , M. Hung, et al. Investor protection and the information content of annual earnings an- nouncements: International evidence[J].Journal ofAccounting and Economics, 2007, 43(1): 37-67.
  • 10DeFond, M. L. and M. Hung. Investor protection and analysts' cash flow forecasts around the world [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2007, 12(2-3): 377-419.

共引文献470

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部