期刊文献+

Use of Mussel Shells as a Soil Amendment:Effects on Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil and Pasture Production 被引量:10

Use of Mussel Shells as a Soil Amendment:Effects on Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil and Pasture Production
原文传递
导出
摘要 Large quantities of mussel shells(66 000-94 000 t year 1),an alkaline material that can be used as a soil amendment,are generated as waste in Galicia,NW Spain.A field trial was carried out by planting different pasture species in a Haplic Umbrisol using a randomized block design with four blocks and six treatments(not amended control or soil amended with lime,finely ground shell,coarsely ground shell,finely ground calcined shell or coarsely ground calcined shell) to compare the effects of lime and mussel shells additions on a soil with a low cation exchange capacity and high Al saturation.The trial was established in March 2007,and samples of plants and soil were collected when plots were harvested in summer 2008(separating the bulk and rhizosphere soil).The soils were analyzed for pH,total C,total N,available P,exchangeable cations,effective cation exchange capacity and available micronutrients.Dry matter yield was measured in all plots and plants were analyzed for nutrients.Application of mussel shells and the commercial lime resulted in an increase in pH and exchangeable Ca and a decrease in exchangeable Al and Al saturation.The stability of pH over time was high.These effects were most noticeable in the rhizosphere.The amendment also had a positive effect on dry matter yield and concentration of Ca in the plant. Large quantities of mussel shells (66000-94000 t year^-1), an alkaline material that can be used as a soil amendment, are generated as waste in Galicia, NW Spain. A field trial was carried out by planting different pasture species in a Haplic Umbrisol using a randomized block design with four blocks and six treatments (not amended control or soil amended with lime, finely ground shell, coarsely ground shell, finely ground calcined shell or coarsely ground calcined shell) to compare the effects of lime and mussel shells additions on a soil with a low cation exchange capacity and high AI saturation. The trial was established in March 2007, and samples of plants and soil were collected when plots were harvested in summer 2008 (separating the bulk and rhizosphere soil). The soils were analyzed for pH, total C, total N, available P, exchangeable cations, effective cation exchange capacity and available micronutrients. Dry matter yield was measured in all plots and plants were analyzed for nutrients. Application of mussel shells and the commercial lime resulted in an increase in pH and exchangeable Ca and a decrease in exchangeable Al and Al were most noticeable in the rhizosphere. The amendment of Ca in the plant. saturation. The stability of pH over time was high. These effects also had a positive effect on dry matter yield and concentration
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第2期152-164,共13页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Government of Spain(No.CTM2005-05922)
关键词 根际土壤 贝壳 散装 修订 阳离子交换容量 土壤PH值 阳离子交换能力 干物质产量 dry matter production, exchangeable A1, liming, pasture quality, soil nutrients
  • 相关文献

参考文献75

  • 1Aitken, R. L., Moody, P. W. and Dickson, T. 1998. Field amelioration of acidic soils in South-East Queensland. I. Effect of amendments on soil properties. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 49:627-637.
  • 2Aivarez, E., Viade, A. and Fernandez-Marcos, M. L. 2009. Effect of liming with different sized limestone on the forms of aluminium in a Galician soil (NW Spain). Geoderma. 152: 1-8.
  • 3Alvarez, E., Viade, A., Fernandez-Marcos, M. L. and Hernandez-Nistal, 3. 2010a. Limestone particle size and liming scheduling influence soil properties and pasture production. Soil Sci. 175: 601-613.
  • 4Alvarez, E., Fernandez-Sanjurjo, M., Otero, X. L. and Macias, F. 2010b. Aluminium geochemistry in the bulk and rhizospheric soil of the species colonizing an abandoned copper mine in Galicia (NW Spain). d. Soil Sediment. 10: 1236-1245.
  • 5Barros, M. C., Magan, A., Valiiio, S., Bello, P. M., Casares, J. J. and Blanco, J. M. 2009. Identification of best available techniques in the seafood industry: a case study. J. Clean. Prod. 17: 391-399.
  • 6Boruvka, L., Mladkova, L. and Drabek, O. 2005. Factors controlling spatial distribution of soil acidification and Al forms in forest soils. J. lnorq. Biochem. 99: 1796- 1806.
  • 7Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. 2002. Soil organic matter. In Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. (eds.) The Nature and Properties of Soils. 13th Edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA.
  • 8Brown, J. C. 1972. Competition between phosphate and the plant for Fe from Fe2+ ferrozine. Agron. J. 64: 240-243.
  • 9Buol, S. W., Sanchez, P. A., Cate, R. B. and Granger, M. A. 1975. Soil fertility capability classification for fertility management. In Bornemisza, E. and Alvarado, A. (eds.) Soil Management in Tropical America. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N. C., USA, pp. 126- 145.
  • 10Chung, J. B. and Zasoski, R. J. 1994. Ammonium-potassium and ammonium-calcium exchange equilibria in bulk and rhizosphere soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1368-1375.

同被引文献203

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部