期刊文献+

大跨度斜拉桥横桥向减震研究 被引量:28

Seismic design for long-span cable-stayed bridges in transverse direction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 斜拉桥在横桥向采用塔-梁、墩-梁固结的约束体系,导致其整体刚度增加,地震惯性力增大,给边墩及其基础的抗震设计造成困难。分别采用位移相关型(方案1)和速度相关型(方案2)两类减震装置对一座斜拉桥的横桥向进行了减震研究。方案1在边墩-主梁间设置位移相关型减震装置,并对其屈服荷载进行了参数分析;方案2对速度相关型减震装置的安装位置和数量进行了优化分析,并对其参数取值进行了参数分析;对横桥向固结体系和减震体系的地震反应进行了对比。结果表明:地震作用下两类减震装置发生滞回变形,延长了结构在横桥向的周期,有效降低了边墩的地震剪力和弯矩反应;横桥向墩-梁间的相对位移会增大,可通过减震装置参数的选取将其控制在合理的范围内;塔底的地震剪力和弯矩反应变化不明显。2种方案均可用于斜拉桥横向减震。 Transverse fixed-restraints employed in the tower-girder connections and the pier-girder connections are able to increase the lateral stiffness,and amplify the inertial force of cable-stayed bridges,which makes it difficult to design the piers and their foundations.Two kinds of damping devices,displacement-dependent(scheme 1) and velocity-dependent(scheme 2),are adopted to reduce the transverse seismic forces of a cable-stayed bridge.For scheme 1,displacement-dependent devices are utilized in the pier-girder connections and a parametric analysis of their yield loads is carried out;for scheme 2,optimization is conducted for the mounting position and the amount of velocity-dependent devices,and then a parametric analysis is carried out;seismic responses of the transverse fixed system and the damping system are compared.The results show that: under the earthquake load,the two devices could both go in hysteretic deformation and elongate the transverse period,which effectively reduces the seismic shear forces and moments of piers;the transverse relative-displacements in pier-girder connections increase,but is controlled by selecting appropriate parameters of damping devices;the seismic forces at the bottom of towers are slightly changed.The two schemes are both effective for the transverse seismic design.
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期86-92,共7页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51008222) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAG15B01)
关键词 斜拉桥 减震设计 参数分析 减震效果 cable-stayed bridge seismic design parametric analysis damping effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1AASHTO. LRFDSEIS - 1 - M Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design[ S]. First Edition and Interim Revisions. Washington DC : American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2008.
  • 2Soong T T, Spencer B F Jr. Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice [J]. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24(3) : 243 -259.
  • 3马欧尼,仝强.E型钢阻尼支座:中国,200820066839.5[P].2009-6-24.
  • 4潘晋,吴成亮,仝强,高峰利.E型钢阻尼器数值仿真及试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2009,28(7):192-195. 被引量:33
  • 5GUAN Zhongguo, LI Jianzhong, XU Yan. Performance test of energy dissipation bearing and its application in seismic control of a longspan bridge [J]. Joumal of Bridge Engineering, 2010, 15(6) : 622 -630.
  • 6管仲国,李建中,朱宇.弹塑性阻尼支座用于自锚式悬索桥减震设计[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(1):6-12. 被引量:18
  • 7Turkington D H, Carr A J, Cooke N, et al. Seismic design of bridges on lead -rubber bearings [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1989, 115 (12) : 3000-3016.
  • 8Robinson W H. Lead -rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes[ J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1982, 10(4) : 593 -604.
  • 9Aiken I D, Nims D K, Whittaker A S, et al. Testing of passive energy dissipation systems [ Jl. Earthquake Spectra, 1993, 9(3) : 335 -370.
  • 10Tam L M, Goel R K. Supplemental viscous damping effects on seismic demands of linear elastic systems[ R]. Report No. CP/SEAM - 2000/01, California, USA: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, 2000.

二级参考文献13

共引文献47

同被引文献131

引证文献28

二级引证文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部