新疆地区部分汉族职业人群症状自评量表常模建立

Establishment of SCL-90 norm for part of Han-Chinese occupational population in Xinjiang region

目的建立新疆地区部分汉族职业人群症状自评量表(SCL-90)常模,为当地职业人群的心理健康研究提供本底资料。方法采用SCL-90对新疆2 246名石油工人、中小学教师、医生、银行职员、环境保护管理技术人员心理健康状况进行测查,计算信度、效度,并分析相关结果。结果全量表内部一致性高达0.981,总体折半相关系数为0.944;各个分量表之间的相关系数为0.537～0.822,各分量表与总量表的相关系数为0.669～0.908;信度、效度良好。2 246名汉族职业人群SCL-90量表得分与全国常模比较,人际敏感得分低于全国常模(P<0.05);躯体化、强迫、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、精神病性因子得分均显著高于全国常模(P<0.05)。各因子分、总分存在职业、年龄、工龄的差异。结论新疆地区部分汉族职业人群SCL-90常模具有较高的内部一致性和较好的内容结构效度,可进行推广应用。

Objective To establish a SCL-90 norm for part of occupational population of Han-Chinese in Xinjiang region and to collect localized background information and data for further research on psychological health in this occupational group. Methods With SCL-90,the psychological health conditions were assessed among 2 246 Han-Chinese working people including oil workers,primary and middle school teachers,physicians,bank staff and environmental workers.The reliability,validity and correlation of the data were calculated and analyzed. Results The overall internal consistency value of the full scale was 0.981 and the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.944;the correlation coefficients values between the subscales were varied from 0.537 to 0.822,the correlation coefficient values between the general scale and different subscales were varied from 0.669 to 0.908.Compared with the national norm of the SCL-90,the results of 2 246 Han-Chinese working people showed that the score of interpersonal sensitivity was lower than that of the national norm（P0.05）,while the scores of somatization,obsessive-compulsive,depression,stress,hostility and psychiatric disease factors were all higher than those of the national norm（P0.05） and the statistically significant differences existed.The difference age,occupation and the working length on the general score and the subscale were observed. Conclusion The establishment of SCL-90 norm for the Han-Chinese occupational population in Xinjiang region does have some advantages in the internal consistency,content validity and structural validity,which can be used by researchers for reference.