期刊文献+

中国正畸专家对错畸形严重程度的主观判断一致性研究 被引量:3

Consistency of the subjective evaluation of malocclusion severity by the Chinese orthodontic experts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析中国正畸专家主观判断错畸形严重程度的一致性。方法:从参与中国正畸疗效评价标准研究的6所院校所提供的具有完整病例资料的完成正畸治疗的2 383例病例中以院校来源和安氏分类作为分层因素随机抽取120例病例,由全国69位正畸专家,根据病例治疗前的模型、头颅侧位片、面像、曲面断层片和病历基本资料主观判断每例错畸形的严重程度,选取轻度、中等偏轻、中等、中等偏重和重度5个严重程度级别之一作为每例的判断结果,并对主观判断结果进行专家自身可靠性和专家之间评价一致性的分析。结果:采用加权Kappa检验分析专家自身可靠性,8.33%的专家自身一致性达到极好水平(Kappa≥0.81);78.33%的专家自身一致性达到好及以上水平(Kappa≥0.61);96.67%的专家自身一致性达到中等及以上水平(Kappa≥0.41)。采用组内相关系数(intra-class correlation coefficient,ICC)检验分析专家之间评价一致性(r=0.989,P<0.01),专家之间评价一致性非常好。结论:中国正畸专家依据病例治疗前的模型、头颅侧位片、面像、曲面断层片和病例基本信息对错畸形严重程度进行主观判断的专家自身可靠性好,且专家之间评价一致性高,这为建立错畸形严重程度的客观分级系统奠定了良好的基础。 Objective: To assess the consistency of the subjective evaluation of malocclusion severity by the Chinese orthodontic experts.Methods: Sixty-nine Chinese orthodontic experts subjectively evaluated the malocclusion severity for 120 cases which were selected randomly from 6 University orthodontic clinics by checking each case's pretreatment records including study cast,lateral head film,panoramic radiograph,facial photographs and patient chart.Each orthodontist was asked to independently rate the severity of every case into five grades: mild,mildly moderate,moderate,severely moderate and severe.Rating data was finally gathered to evaluate the intra-judge's reliability and the inter-judges' consistency.Results: Weighted Kappa test revealed that 8.33% orthodontists showed excellent intra-judge's reliability(Kappa≥0.81),78.33% orthodontists showed good intra-judge's reliability(Kappa≥0.61) and 96.67% specialists displayed general intra-judge's reliability(Kappa≥0.41).And intra-class correlation coefficient demonstrated a high level of inter-judges' consistency(r=0.989,P0.01).Conclusion: Good intra-judge's reliability and inter-judges' consistency can be demonstrated in the subjective evaluation of malocclusion severity by the Chinese orthodontic experts,which could the basis for establi-shing the objective grading system of malocclusion severity.
出处 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期98-102,共5页 Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项(200802056)资助~~
关键词 错 疾病严重程度 判断 可重复性 结果 正畸学 Malocclusion Severity of illness index Judgment Reproducibility of results Orthodontics
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1林久祥.现代口腔正畸学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1999.659.
  • 2Cassinelli AG,Firestone AR,Beck FM,et al.Factors associated with orthodontists' assessment of difficulty[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,2003,123(5):497-502.
  • 3Pae EK,McKenna GA,Sheehan TJ,et al.Role of lateral cephalograms in assessing severity and difficulty of orthodontic cases[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortbop,2001,120(3):254-262.
  • 4Bergstrom K,Halling A.Comparison of three indices in evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome[J].Acta Odontol Scand,1997,55(1):36-43.
  • 5Daniels C,Richmond S.The development of the Index of Complexity,Outcome,and Need (ICON)[J].Br J Orthod,2000,27(2):149-162.
  • 6Richmond S,Aylott NA,Panahei ME,et al.A 2-center comparison of orthodontist' s perceptions of orthodontic treatment difficulty[J].Angle Orthod,2001,71(5):404-410.
  • 7Bergstr(o)m K,Halling A,Huggare J,et ai.Treatment difficulty and treatment outcome in orthodontic care[J].Euro J Orthod,1998,20(2):145-157.
  • 8Summers CJ.The occlusal index:a system for identifying scoring occlusal disorders[J].Am J Orthod,1971,59(6):552-567.
  • 9DeGuzman L,Bahiraei D,Vig KW,et al.The validation of the PAR Index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1995,107(2):172-176.
  • 10Gramling JF.The Probability Index[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1995,107(2):165-171.

二级参考文献12

  • 1栾建安,王纪宪,苏炳华,朱长青.多类别多评估者的kappa分析[J].中国卫生统计,1995,12(6):20-22. 被引量:26
  • 2颜文伟.检验一致性的统计方法[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19(6):367-371.
  • 3[1]Barkto J J,Carpenter W T.On the methods and theory of reliability.The Journal of Nervous And Mental Disorder,1976,163(5):307~317
  • 4[4]Armstrong B K,White E,Saracci R.Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology.New York:Oxford University Press,1992,78~112
  • 5[5]Landis J R,Koch G G.The measurement of observer agreement for Categorical data.Biometrics,1977,33:159~174
  • 6[6]Hall J N.Inter-rater reliability of ward rating scales.Brit J Psychiat,1974,125:248~255
  • 7[7]Spitzer R L,Cohen J,Fleiss J L,et al.Quantification of agreement in psychiatric disgnosis.Arch Gen Psychiat,1967,17:83~87
  • 8[9]Hays R D,Anderson R T,Revicki D.Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials.In:Staquet MJ,Hays RD,Fayers PM.Ed.Quality of life assessment in clinical trials.Oxford.Oxford University Press,1998,169~182
  • 9[10]Blackman N J M,Koval J J.Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement.Statistics in Medicine,2000,19:723~741
  • 10[11]Shrout P E,Fleiss J L.Intraclass correlations:uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin,1979,86(2):420~428

共引文献81

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部