期刊文献+

后路微创化技术治疗下腰椎退变性疾病 被引量:5

Minimally invasive surgery by posterior way to treat low lumbar diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的介绍两种微创手术,通过减压和椎体间融合治疗部分下腰椎退变性疾病,总结该技术相对于传统开放术的利弊。方法 (1)经皮椎弓根螺钉植入+小切口椎板开窗或椎间盘镜下开窗减压,椎间植骨融合术,共9例;(2)小切口棘旁两侧分次有限暴露固定并减压椎间植骨融合术,共38例。所有病例分别于术后3、6、12个月得到随访。结果本组与传统术式相比,手术时间、出血量及骨性融合率都无显著性差异,但融合病发生率显著降低,术后开始训练时间显著提早。结论微创化术式可减少局部创伤,提早康复锻炼,降低融合病发生率。 Objective To Introduce two types of minimally invasive surgery by decompression and interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar diseases,and summarize the advantages and disadvantages compared with the traditional open technique.Methods 9 patients underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and decompression and interbody fusion through a smalll incision or under microendoscopic discectomy.38 patients underwent pedicle screw fixation,decompression and interbody fusion through a small incision at both sides of the spinous process by limited and orderly exposed.All patients were followed up at 3,6,12 months after operation.Results Compared with the traditional open technique,there was no statistically significant difference in operative time,blood loss and the fusion rate,but significantly reduced the incidence of"Fusion disease"and shorten the time to start early rehabilitation.Conclusion Minimally invasive surgical technique could achieve less local tissue damage,low incidence of"Fusion disease"and rehabilitation exercise.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2012年第1期3-5,共3页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 微创术 腰椎疾病 椎间融合 minimally invasive surgery lumbar diseases interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Mummaneni PV,Haid Rw,Rodts GE.Lumbar interbodyfusion:state-of-the-art technical advances.Invited submission from thejoint section on disorders of the spine and peri pheral nerves[J].Neuro Surg(Spine),2004,1:24-30.
  • 2GeJo R,Matsui H,Kawaguchi y,et al.Serial changes in trunkmuscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery[J].Spine,1999,24:1023-1028.
  • 3Chen CS,Cheng CK,Liucl.A biomechanical comparison ofposterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the the lumberspine[J].Spinal Disord Tech,2002,15:53-63.
  • 4Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al.minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF):technical feasibilityang initial results[J].Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18:1-6.
  • 5范顺武,方向前,赵兴,赵凤东,虞和君.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):81-85. 被引量:54
  • 6戴守达,董小雄,张耘,王永宏,张洪思,周正顺,陈刚,吕峰,刘洪业,韩顺.腰椎间盘突出症传统手术方式与内窥镜(MED)疗效的回顾性分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2010,31(5):349-351. 被引量:7

二级参考文献19

  • 1赵兴,范顺武.腰椎及腰骶椎融合术后邻近节段的退行性疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(10):618-621. 被引量:12
  • 2戴守达,董小雄,张耘,王永宏,张洪师,周正顺.显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术的适应证选择与疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):252-254. 被引量:8
  • 3胡辉林,黎庆初,刘雄文.MED腰椎手术失败综合征相关因素回顾分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2007,28(4):307-309. 被引量:8
  • 4Nakai O,Ookawa A,Yamaura I. Long-term roentgenographic and functional changes in palients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis[J]. Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1991,73(8):1194-1191.
  • 5Brayda-Bruno M,Cinnella P. Poslerior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedures)[J]. Eur Spine J.2000,9 (Suppl 1): 24-29.
  • 6Sung W,Daniel H,Alberto C,et al. Endoscopie foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens [J]. Spine,2000, 25(2 ) : 260-264.
  • 7Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF):technical feasibility and initial results.J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18 Suppl:S1-6.
  • 8Roland M,Fairbank J.The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire.Spine,2000,25:3115-3124.
  • 9Hackenberg L,Halm H,Bullmann V,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.Eur Spine J,2005,14:551-558.
  • 10Hee HT,Castro FP Jr,Majd ME,et al.Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:analysis of complications and predictive factors.J Spinal Disord,2001,14:533-540.

共引文献59

同被引文献39

  • 1胡有谷,陈伯华.腰椎间盘突出症经典手术时行腰椎融合的指征[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):247-248. 被引量:42
  • 2King D. Internal fixation of lumbosacral fu-sion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1948,30:560-565.
  • 3Herkowitz H N, Kurz L T.Degenerative lum-bar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenos.Aprospective study comparing decompressionwith decompression and intertransverse pro-cess arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1991,73:802-808.
  • 4Wiltse LL,Bateman JG,Hutchinson RH,et al.The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approachto the lumbar spine[JJ. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1968,5的 19-926.
  • 5Anil S,Sandra L,Rahul V. Transforaminal lum-bar interbody fusion using unilateral pediclescrews and a translaminar screw[J]. Eur SpineJ, 2009,18:430-434.
  • 6Sethi A,Muzumdar AM,Ingalhalikar A,et al.Biomechanical analysis of a novel posteriorconstruct in a transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion model an in vitro study[J|. SpineJf2011,11(9):863-869.
  • 7Yiicesoy K,Ytiksel KZ,Baek S,et al. Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabi- lization of unilateral vertebral disease[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2008, 8:44-51.
  • 8Ferndndez-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramirez H, et al. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented pos- terolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis [J].Spine, 2007,32 : 395-40 1.
  • 9Aoki Y,Yamagata M, Ikeda Y,et al. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis:unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pediele screws and 2 cages. Clinical article[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012, 17 : 153-159.
  • 10Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS,et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion[J]. Spine,2006,6~712-716.

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部